137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21534157)
1. The common rule, pregnant women, and research: no need to "rescue" that which should be revised.
Kaposy C; Baylis F
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):60-2. PubMed ID: 21534157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The two-patient framework for research during pregnancy: a critique and a better way forward.
Liaschenko J; DeBruin D; Marshall MF
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):66-8. PubMed ID: 21534160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):39-49. PubMed ID: 21534151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The fetus as a patient and the ethics of human subjects research: response to commentaries on "An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients".
McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):W3-7. PubMed ID: 21534136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Disclosure of adverse clinical trial results--should legal immunity be granted to drug companies?
Vernillo A
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):45-7. PubMed ID: 19998162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research with pregnant women and fetuses: update on the ethics and the law.
Hall JK
J Nurs Law; 2000 Nov; 7(3):7-17. PubMed ID: 12848177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Who is a patient and why does it matter?
Iltis AS
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):62-4. PubMed ID: 21534158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Disclosing clinical trial results: publicity, significance and independence.
Liao SM; Sheehan M; Clarke S
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):W3-5. PubMed ID: 19998144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reframing the framework: toward fair inclusion of pregnant women as participants in research.
Lyerly AD; Little MO; Faden RR
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):50-2. PubMed ID: 21534152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New human subjects rule for pregnant women and fetuses.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Mar; 16(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 11933950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research in pregnancy: back to first principles.
Shalowitz DI; Ecker JL
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):56-7. PubMed ID: 21534155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Unacceptable risk in pregnancy: whose choice and responsibility?
Perry C
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):64-5. PubMed ID: 21534159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The moral claims of the wanted fetus.
Lappé M
Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Apr; 5(2):11-3. PubMed ID: 1123292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring the moderate consensus.
Toulmin S
Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Jun; 5(3):31-40. PubMed ID: 1150416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pragmatism as a complementary approach to legislation: closing regulatory gaps in human subject research.
Vernillo A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):15-7. PubMed ID: 19061099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Respecting participant autonomy and the disclosure of clinical trial results.
Oakley J
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):38. PubMed ID: 19998158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Emergent obligations to the former fetal research subject.
Kipnis K
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):54-6. PubMed ID: 21534154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The ethics of disclosing to research subjects the availability of off-label marketed drugs.
Taylor HA; Kuwana E; Wilfond BS
Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(4):51. PubMed ID: 24730496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The duty to disclose (even more) adverse clinical trial results.
Hassoun N
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):33-4. PubMed ID: 19998155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Women of childbearing potential in clinical research: perspectives on NIH policy and liability issues.
Hayunga EG; Rothenberg KH; Pinn VW
Food Drug Cosmet Med Device Law Dig; 1996 Jan; 13(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 11660302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
