These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21534232)

  • 1. Evaluation of radiologically implanted central venous port systems explanted due to complications.
    Teichgräber UK; Kausche S; Nagel SN
    J Vasc Access; 2011; 12(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 21534232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Central venous port implantations via the cephalic vein applying an intravasal electrographic control of the catheter tip position: a single-center experience of 316 cases.
    Schenck M; Schneider T; Rübben H; Eisenhardt A
    World J Urol; 2012 Jun; 30(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21874511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Common and uncommon complications of totally implantable central venous ports: a pictorial essay.
    Perdikakis E; Kehagias E; Tsetis D
    J Vasc Access; 2012; 13(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 22307469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Central venous access port devices - a pictorial review of common complications from the interventional radiology perspective.
    Ananthakrishnan G; McDonald R; Moss J; Kasthuri R
    J Vasc Access; 2012; 13(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 21725953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterizing resolution of catheter-associated upper extremity deep venous thrombosis.
    Jones MA; Lee DY; Segall JA; Landry GJ; Liem TK; Mitchell EL; Moneta GL
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Jan; 51(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 19879094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Interventional radiological imaging and treatment of port catheter dysfunctions].
    Kausche S; Nagel SN; Teichgräber U
    Rofo; 2011 Mar; 183(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 21174257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [How should urologists perform implantation of subcutaneous central venous port systems? A single center experience of 347 cases].
    Schenck M; Michels-Oswald W; Tschirdewahn S; Rübben H; Vom Dorp F; Rose A; Panic A; Niedworok C; Rossi R
    Urologe A; 2012 Feb; 51(2):226-37. PubMed ID: 21927874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis related to central venous port systems implanted in cancer patients.
    Yukisawa S; Fujiwara Y; Yamamoto Y; Ueno T; Matsueda K; Kohno A; Suenaga M
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 83(994):850-3. PubMed ID: 20223904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrospective evaluation of totally implantable venous access port devices: early and late complications.
    Gurkan S; Seber S; Gur O; Yetisyigit T; Okan Donbaloglu M; Ozkaramanli Gur D
    J BUON; 2015; 20(1):338-45. PubMed ID: 25778336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical outcomes of totally implantable venous access port placement via the axillary vein in patients with head and neck malignancy.
    Hong S; Seo TS; Song MG; Seol HY; Suh SI; Ryoo IS
    J Vasc Access; 2019 Mar; 20(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 29923460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subcutaneous venous port implantation in adult patients: a single center experience.
    Cil BE; Canyiğit M; Peynircioğlu B; Hazirolan T; Carkaci S; Cekirge S; Balkanci F
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2006 Jun; 12(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 16752357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double-lumen central venous port catheters: simultaneous application for chemotherapy and parenteral nutrition in cancer patients.
    Teichgräber UK; Nagel SN; Kausche S; Streitparth F; Cho CH
    J Vasc Access; 2010; 11(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 20954131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Experiences with ultrasound-guided port implantations via the lateral subclavian vein: a retrospective analysis of 1532 patients].
    Chang DH; Boecker J; Hellmich M; Krug KB
    Rofo; 2012 Aug; 184(8):726-33. PubMed ID: 22618474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polyurethane versus silicone catheters for central venous port devices implanted at the forearm.
    Wildgruber M; Lueg C; Borgmeyer S; Karimov I; Braun U; Kiechle M; Meier R; Koehler M; Ettl J; Berger H
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 59():113-124. PubMed ID: 27023050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A retrospective analysis on the utility and complications of upper arm ports in 433 cases at a single institute.
    Mori Y; Nagayama S; Kawamura J; Hasegawa S; Tanaka E; Okabe H; Takeuchi M; Sonobe M; Matsumoto S; Kanai M; Muto M; Chiba T; Sakai Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 21(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 26507141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective randomized comparative evaluation of proximal valve polyurethane and distal valve silicone peripherally inserted central catheters.
    Ong CK; Venkatesh SK; Lau GB; Wang SC
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1191-6. PubMed ID: 20598573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Severe Neutropenia at the Time of Implantable Subcutaneous Chest Port Insertion Is Not a Risk Factor for Port Removal at a Tertiary Pediatric Center.
    Hoss DR; Bedros AA; Mesipam A; Criddle J; Smith JC
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):398-402. PubMed ID: 28034702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of a protocol for the prevention of hemodialysis venous catheter-related infections.
    Cornacchiari M; Heidempergher M; Stasi A; Baroli A; Bertoncini L; Turri C; Bellotti N; Guastoni C
    J Vasc Access; 2011; 12(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 21534231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience at a single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical complications caused by implanted central venous access devices in pediatric and adult patients.
    Bessoud B; de Baere T; Kuoch V; Desruennes E; Cosset MF; Lassau N; Roche A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Feb; 180(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 12540466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Explantation of totally implantable venous access ports of the forearm: reasons for removal and observed complications.
    Goltz JP; Kickuth R; Scholl A; Machann W; Ritter CO; Hahn D; Wittenberg G
    J Vasc Access; 2011; 12(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 21038301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.