148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21534821)
1. Effect of surface roughness and low-level laser therapy on removal torque of implants placed in rat femurs.
Primo BT; da Silva RC; Grossmann E; Miguens SA; Hernandez PA; Silva AN
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 21534821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit.
Klokkevold PR; Johnson P; Dadgostari S; Caputo A; Davies JE; Nishimura RD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Aug; 12(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 11488864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Buser D; Nydegger T; Hirt HP; Cochran DL; Nolte LP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 9796144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical stability of immediately loaded implants with various surfaces and designs: a pilot study in dogs.
Neugebauer J; Weinländer M; Lekovic V; von Berg KH; Zoeller JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 20162113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of alendronate on endosseous implant integration: an in vivo study in rabbits.
Chacon GE; Stine EA; Larsen PE; Beck FM; McGlumphy EA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1005-9. PubMed ID: 16781331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Jones AA; Bakaeen LG; Buser D; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21486176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of Ca(2+) modifications for osseointegration of smooth and moderately rough anodized titanium implants - a removal torque and histological evaluation in rabbit.
Fröjd V; Wennerberg A; Franke Stenport V
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):737-45. PubMed ID: 20977616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of surface modifications on early bone healing around plateau root form implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Suzuki M; Calasans-Maia MD; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Granjeiro JM; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1631-8. PubMed ID: 20430505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit.
Sennerby L; Dasmah A; Larsson B; Iverhed M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7 Suppl 1():S13-20. PubMed ID: 16137083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model.
Yang GL; He FM; Yang XF; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):516-24. PubMed ID: 18602288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histomorphometric analysis and removal torque of small diameter implants with alternative surface treatments and different designs.
Ahn SJ; Leesungbok R; Lee SW
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(4):263-72. PubMed ID: 20735263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability of loaded and unloaded implants with different surfaces.
Nergiz I; Arpak N; Bostanci H; Scorziello TM; Schmage P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 19492645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peri-implant bone formations around (Ti,Zr)O(2) -coated zirconia implants with different surface roughness.
Chung SH; Kim HK; Shon WJ; Park YS
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Apr; 40(4):404-11. PubMed ID: 23425208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
