These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21534922)

  • 1. Partially ordered sets: ranking and prediction of substances' properties.
    Restrepo G; Brüggemann R; Klein DJ
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2011 Jun; 7(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 21534922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flow network QSAR for the prediction of physicochemical properties by mapping an electrical resistance network onto a chemical reaction poset.
    Ivanciuc O; Ivanciuc T; Klein DJ
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2013 Jun; 9(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 23700997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Posetic quantitative superstructure/activity relationships (QSSARs) for chlorobenzenes.
    Ivanciuc T; Ivanciuc O; Klein DJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):870-9. PubMed ID: 16045280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling the bioconcentration factors and bioaccumulation factors of polychlorinated biphenyls with posetic quantitative super-structure/activity relationships (QSSAR).
    Ivanciuc T; Ivanciuc O; Klein DJ
    Mol Divers; 2006 May; 10(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 16710809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combinatorics of reaction-network posets.
    Klein DJ; Ivanciuc T; Ryzhov A; Ivanciuc O
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2008 Nov; 11(9):723-33. PubMed ID: 18991575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the ranking probabilities for partial orders based on random linear extensions.
    Lerche D; Sørensen PB
    Chemosphere; 2003 Dec; 53(8):981-92. PubMed ID: 14505721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ranking using the Copeland score: a comparison with the Hasse diagram.
    Al-Sharrah G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 May; 50(5):785-91. PubMed ID: 20426492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of chemicals applying partial order ranking techniques.
    Carlsen L
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2008 Dec; 11(10):794-805. PubMed ID: 19075601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A hitchhiker's guide to poset ranking.
    De Loof K; De Baets B; De Meyer H; Brüggemann R
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2008 Nov; 11(9):734-44. PubMed ID: 18991576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linear QSAR regression models for the prediction of bioconcentration factors by physicochemical properties and structural theoretical molecular descriptors.
    Papa E; Dearden JC; Gramatica P
    Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 17109926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying the concept of partially ordered sets on the ranking of near-shore sediments by a battery of tests.
    Brüggemann R; Halfon E; Welzl G; Voigt K; Steinberg CE
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2001; 41(4):918-25. PubMed ID: 11500108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A QSAR investigation of dermal and respiratory chemical sensitizers based on computational chemistry properties.
    Warne MA; Nicholson JK; Lindon JC; Guiney PD; Gartland KP
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009 Jul; 20(5-6):429-51. PubMed ID: 19916108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of Multiple Partially Ordered Responses to Belief Items with Don't Know Option.
    Ip EH; Chen SH; Quandt SA
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):483-505. PubMed ID: 25479822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing and Grouping Chemicals Applying Partial Ordering Alkyl Anilines as an Illustrative Example.
    Carlsen L; Bruggemann R
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2018; 21(5):349-357. PubMed ID: 29866002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved estimation of the ranking probabilities in partial orders using random linear extensions by approximation of the mutual ranking probability.
    Lerche D; Sørensen PB; Brüggemann R
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(5):1471-80. PubMed ID: 14502480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of partial order technique with three methods of multi-criteria analysis for ranking of chemical substances.
    Lerche D; Brüggemann R; Sørensen P; Carlsen L; Nielsen OJ
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2002; 42(5):1086-98. PubMed ID: 12376995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ranking of concern, based on environmental indexes, for pharmaceutical and personal care products: an application to the Spanish case.
    Ortiz de García S; Pinto GP; García-Encina PA; Irusta Mata RI
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():384-97. PubMed ID: 23995140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of model performance for six quantitative structure-activity relationship packages that predict acute toxicity to fish.
    Moore DR; Breton RL; MacDonald DB
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1799-809. PubMed ID: 12924579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consensus QSAR modeling of toxicity of pharmaceuticals to different aquatic organisms: Ranking and prioritization of the DrugBank database compounds.
    Khan K; Benfenati E; Roy K
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Jan; 168():287-297. PubMed ID: 30390527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the combined monitoring-based and modelling-based priority setting scheme with partial order theory and random linear extensions for ranking of chemical substances.
    Lerche D; Sørensen PB; Larsen HS; Carlsen L; Nielsen OJ
    Chemosphere; 2002 Nov; 49(6):637-49. PubMed ID: 12430651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.