These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21536201)

  • 21. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
    Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy of Super Slick elastomeric modules in reducing friction during sliding: a comparative in vitro study.
    Pattan SK; Peddu R; Bandaru SK; Lanka D; Mallavarapu K; Pathan AB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Sep; 15(5):543-51. PubMed ID: 25707823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Tselepis M; Brockhurst P; West VC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 8059748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biodegradation of orthodontic metallic brackets and associated implications for friction.
    Regis S; Soares P; Camargo ES; Guariza Filho O; Tanaka O; Maruo H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 21967937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.
    Doshi UH; Bhad-Patil WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21195280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.
    Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets.
    Yanase Y; Ioi H; Uehara M; Hara A; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19885424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
    Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reduction in static friction by deposition of a homogeneous diamond-like carbon (DLC) coating on orthodontic brackets.
    Akaike S; Hayakawa T; Kobayashi D; Aono Y; Hirata A; Hiratsuka M; Nakamura Y
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(6):888-95. PubMed ID: 26632239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
    Michelberger DJ; Eadie RL; Faulkner MG; Glover KE; Prasad NG; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparative in vitro study of frictional resistance between lingual brackets and stainless steel archwires.
    Ozturk Ortan Y; Yurdakuloglu Arslan T; Aydemir B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 21239394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.
    Downing A; McCabe J; Gordon P
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Nov; 21(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 7857894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of friction forces between stainless orthodontic steel brackets and TiNi wires in wet and dry conditions.
    Phukaoluan A; Khantachawana A; Kaewtatip P; Dechkunakorn S; Anuwongnukroh N; Santiwong P; Kajornchaiyakul J
    Int Orthod; 2017 Mar; 15(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 28162971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of the frictional characteristics of five initial alignment wires and stainless steel brackets at three bracket to wire angulations--an in vitro study.
    Dickson JA; Jones SP; Davies EH
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Feb; 21(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8199160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Variation in surface topography of different NiTi orthodontic archwires in various commercial fluoride-containing environments.
    Huang HH
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 16417915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of simulated erosive conditions on the frictional behavior of different orthodontic bracket-wire combinations.
    Stefański T; Kloc-Ptaszna A; Postek-Stefańska L
    Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(2):173-177. PubMed ID: 31274255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; Prewitt MJ
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 1763840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of frictional forces between ceramic brackets and archwires of different alloys compared with metal brackets.
    Guerrero AP; Guariza Filho O; Tanaka O; Camargo ES; Vieira S
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20339712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Resistance to sliding of titanium brackets tested against stainless steel and beta-titanium archwires with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Whitley JQ; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17346598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Brackets and friction in orthodontics: experimental study].
    Ben Rejeb Jdir S; Tobji S; Turki W; Dallel I; Khedher N; Ben Amor A
    Orthod Fr; 2015 Sep; 86(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 26370596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.