163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21536291)
1. A novel multi-planar radiography method for three dimensional pose reconstruction of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joints after arthroplasty.
Amiri S; Wilson DR; Masri BA; Sharma G; Anglin C
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1757-64. PubMed ID: 21536291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EOS orthopaedic imaging system to study patellofemoral kinematics: assessment of uncertainty.
Azmy C; Guérard S; Bonnet X; Gabrielli F; Skalli W
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Feb; 96(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 20170853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy evaluation of fluoroscopy-based 2D and 3D pose reconstruction with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Van Duren BH; Pandit H; Beard DJ; Murray DW; Gill HS
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Apr; 31(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 18606555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo three-dimensional patellar tracking on the femur.
Asano T; Akagi M; Koike K; Nakamura T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):222-32. PubMed ID: 12897613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The coupled motion of the femur and patella during in vivo weightbearing knee flexion.
Li G; Papannagari R; Nha KW; Defrate LE; Gill TJ; Rubash HE
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):937-43. PubMed ID: 18067400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional motion study of femur, tibia, and patella at the knee joint from bi-plane fluoroscopy and CT images.
Ohnishi T; Suzuki M; Nawata A; Naomoto S; Iwasaki T; Haneishi H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2010 Jul; 3(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 20821089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of in vivo patellofemoral kinematics for subjects having high-flexion total knee arthroplasty implant with patients having normal knees.
Leszko F; Sharma A; Komistek RD; Mahfouz MR; Cates HE; Scuderi GR
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 19232891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty improves patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact stress: in vivo measurements in the same patients.
Sawaguchi N; Majima T; Ishigaki T; Mori N; Terashima T; Minami A
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 19775856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detecting condylar contact loss using single-plane fluoroscopy: a comparison with in vivo force data and in vitro bi-plane data.
Prins AH; Kaptein BL; Banks SA; Stoel BC; Nelissen RG; Valstar ER
J Biomech; 2014 May; 47(7):1682-8. PubMed ID: 24636719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of mobile biplane X-ray imaging in measuring 6-degree-of-freedom patellofemoral kinematics during overground gait.
Gray HA; Guan S; Pandy MG
J Biomech; 2017 May; 57():152-156. PubMed ID: 28454908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinematics among three different total knee designs.
Chew JT; Stewart NJ; Hanssen AD; Luo ZP; Rand JA; An KN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):87-98. PubMed ID: 9418625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo patellar tracking: clinical motions and patellofemoral indices.
Nha KW; Papannagari R; Gill TJ; Van de Velde SK; Freiberg AA; Rubash HE; Li G
J Orthop Res; 2008 Aug; 26(8):1067-74. PubMed ID: 18327809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of isolated femur and tibia rotations on patella cartilage stress: a sensitivity analysis.
Liao TC; Yin L; Powers CM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 May; 54():125-131. PubMed ID: 29579721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics during deep flexion kneeling in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
Nakamura E; Banks SA; Tanaka A; Sei A; Mizuta H
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1120-4. PubMed ID: 18823746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A robust method for registration of three-dimensional knee implant models to two-dimensional fluoroscopy images.
Mahfouz MR; Hoff WA; Komistek RD; Dennis DA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1561-74. PubMed ID: 14649746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis.
Stiehl JB; Dennis DA; Komistek RD; Keblish PA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):60-6. PubMed ID: 9418622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New registration algorithm for determining 3D knee kinematics using CT and single-plane fluoroscopy with improved out-of-plane translation accuracy.
Scarvell JM; Pickering MR; Smith PN
J Orthop Res; 2010 Mar; 28(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 19798739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accurate assessment of patellar tracking using fiducial and intensity-based fluoroscopic techniques.
Tang TS; MacIntyre NJ; Gill HS; Fellows RA; Hill NA; Wilson DR; Ellis RE
Med Image Anal; 2004 Sep; 8(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 15450227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The quality of bone surfaces may govern the use of model based fluoroscopy in the determination of joint laxity.
Moewis P; Wolterbeek N; Diederichs G; Valstar E; Heller MO; Taylor WR
Med Eng Phys; 2012 Dec; 34(10):1427-32. PubMed ID: 22342557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of femoral component design on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty: Genesis II prosthesis versus Vanguard prosthesis.
Kong CG; Park SW; Yang H; In Y
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Apr; 134(4):571-6. PubMed ID: 24515865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
