BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21536360)

  • 1. Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect.
    Schmitz R; Peigneux P
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 21536360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective modulations of attentional asymmetries after sleep deprivation.
    Schmitz R; Deliens G; Mary A; Urbain C; Peigneux P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3351-60. PubMed ID: 21871469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional bias as trait: correlations with novelty seeking.
    Tomer R
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2064-70. PubMed ID: 18342343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developmental changes in visual line bisection in women throughout adulthood.
    Beste C; Hamm JP; Hausmann M
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 30(2):753-67. PubMed ID: 16995835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual line bisection in sinistrals and dextrals as a function of hemispace, hand, and scan direction.
    Brodie EE; Dunn EM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Jul; 58(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 15919545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rightward collisions and their association with pseudoneglect.
    Nicholls ME; Loftus AM; Orr CA; Barre N
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov; 68(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 18495310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
    Thomas NA; Castine BR; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between collisions and pseudoneglect: is it right?
    Hatin B; Sykes Tottenham L; Oriet C
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 21696716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies.
    Niemeier M; Stojanoski B; Singh VW; Chu E
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 18243459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Things that go bump in the right: the effect of unimanual activity on rightward collisions.
    Nicholls ME; Loftus A; Mayer K; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):1122-6. PubMed ID: 16999981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contralesional spatial bias in chronic hemianopia: the role of (ec)centric fixation, spatial cueing and visual search.
    Kuhn C; Bublak P; Jobst U; Rosenthal A; Reinhart S; Kerkhoff G
    Neuroscience; 2012 May; 210():118-27. PubMed ID: 22465437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space.
    Heber IA; Siebertz S; Wolter M; Kuhlen T; Fimm B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 20537456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pseudoneglect: evidence for both perceptual and attentional factors.
    Porac C; Searleman A; Karagiannakis K
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Aug; 61(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 16527384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect.
    Bultitude JH; Aimola Davies AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1849-58. PubMed ID: 16701730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Right visual field advantage for perceived contrast: correlation with an auditory bias and handedness.
    Railo H; Tallus J; Hämäläinen H
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec; 77(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 21962763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmental changes in line bisection: a result of callosal maturation?
    Hausmann M; Waldie KE; Corballis MC
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Jan; 17(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 12597084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias in visual attention behavior in a normal school-aged population.
    Cairo Valcarcel E; Ijalba E; Obler LK; Gomez Lozano R; Marin Llanes R; Devia Collazos C; Bouza Herrera C
    Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):291-6. PubMed ID: 12030455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.