These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21536451)

  • 1. Testing differences in proportions.
    Fisher MJ; Marshall AP; Mitchell M
    Aust Crit Care; 2011 May; 24(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 21536451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistics for clinicians. 2. Nominal data (I).
    Nanivadekar AS; Kannappan AR
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1990 Dec; 38(12):931-5, 974. PubMed ID: 2096131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Symmetry in square contingency tables: tests of hypotheses and confidence interval construction.
    May WL; Johnson WD
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):23-33. PubMed ID: 11459440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biostatistics Series Module 4: Comparing Groups - Categorical Variables.
    Hazra A; Gogtay N
    Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 27512183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.
    Kangave D
    West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.
    Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Group sequential large sample T2-like chi2 tests for multivariate observations.
    Lachin JM; Greenhouse SW; Bautista OM
    Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(21):3357-68. PubMed ID: 14566920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?
    Osborn JF
    Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):417-32. PubMed ID: 2483622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Common statistical methods in orthopaedic clinical studies.
    Griffin D; Audige L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):70-9. PubMed ID: 12897598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Appropriate application of statistical analysis method in medical science and technology articles].
    Gou L; Yu J; Yang Z
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 19(11):925-7. PubMed ID: 16334245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing binomial parameters.
    Agresti A; Bini M; Bertaccini B; Ryu E
    Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1270-5. PubMed ID: 18266891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On Fisher's exact test for detecting gametic disequilibrium between DNA polymorphisms.
    Zapata C; Alvarez G
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):71-7. PubMed ID: 9066929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical inference from qualitative data: proportions, relative risks and odds ratios.
    Indrayan A; Satyanarayana L
    Indian Pediatr; 2000 Sep; 37(9):967-81. PubMed ID: 10992333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence intervals that match Fisher's exact or Blaker's exact tests.
    Fay MP
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):373-4. PubMed ID: 19948745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A reduction factor in goodness-of-fit and independence tests for clustered and weighted observations.
    Choi JW; McHugh RB
    Biometrics; 1989 Sep; 45(3):979-96. PubMed ID: 2790132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2 x 2 contingency table: an overview of Fisher's exact test and Yates' correction for continuity.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):43-70. PubMed ID: 7613560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The score test for independence in R x C contingency tables with missing data.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):751-62. PubMed ID: 8672711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of the use of statistical techniques in original articles published in the Medicina Clínica during 3 decades (1962-1992)].
    González JC; Pulido M; Sanz F
    Med Clin (Barc); 1995 Apr; 104(12):448-52. PubMed ID: 7739280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.