219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21537538)
1. Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.
Domingues GR; Moraes-Filho JP; Domingues AG
Arq Gastroenterol; 2011; 48(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21537538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Day-to-day variability in acid reflux patterns using the BRAVO pH monitoring system.
Ahlawat SK; Novak DJ; Williams DC; Maher KA; Barton F; Benjamin SB
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2006 Jan; 40(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16340628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of two modes of gastroesophageal reflux measuring: conventional esophageal pH monitoring and wireless pH monitoring.
Azzam RS; Sallum RA; Brandão JF; Navarro-Rodriguez T; Nasi A
Arq Gastroenterol; 2012; 49(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 22766996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance, tolerability, and symptoms related to prolonged pH monitoring using the Bravo system in Mexico.
Remes-Troche JM; Ibarra-Palomino J; Carmona-Sánchez RI; Valdovinos MA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2382-6. PubMed ID: 16279888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interference with daily activities and major adverse events during esophageal pH monitoring with bravo wireless capsule versus conventional intranasal catheter: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Iluyomade A; Olowoyeye A; Fadahunsi O; Thomas L; Libend CN; Ragunathan K; Fenster J; Vignesh S
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Feb; 30(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 26952638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical utility and tolerability of JSPH-1 wireless esophageal pH monitoring system.
Li JN; Liu CL; Tao XH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 13():10. PubMed ID: 23317032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wireless esophageal pH capsule for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter clinical study.
Yang XJ; Gan T; Wang L; Liao Z; Tao XH; Shen W; Zhao XY
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(40):14865-74. PubMed ID: 25356046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wireless pH capsule--yield in clinical practice.
Roman S; Mion F; Zerbib F; Benamouzig R; Letard JC; Bruley des Varannes S
Endoscopy; 2012 Mar; 44(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 22275050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic pH monitoring for patients with suspected or refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Turner BG; Saltzman JR; Hua L; Maurer R; Feldman N; Carr-Locke DL; Burakoff R; Liu JJ
Can J Gastroenterol; 2007 Nov; 21(11):737-41. PubMed ID: 18026578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.
Bansal A; Wani S; Rastogi A; Rastogi K; Goyal A; Hall S; Singh V; Higbee A; Sharma P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2918-25. PubMed ID: 19755975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic demonstration of a wireless capsule pH monitor in the esophagus.
Javors BR; Bukman R
Dysphagia; 2011 Jun; 26(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 20443028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)].
Mönkemüller K; Neumann H; Fry LC; Kolfenbach S; Malfertheiner P
Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wireless ambulatory pH studies: manometric or endoscopic guidance?
Nusrat S; Roy PM; Bielefeldt K
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jan; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21676068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oesophageal pH monitoring using the Bravo catheter-free radio capsule.
Gillies RS; Stratford JM; Booth MI; Dehn TC
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jan; 19(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 17206078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wireless capsules for esophageal pH monitoring: are we placing them correctly?
Doma S; Paladugu S; Parkman HP; Friedenberg FK
Digestion; 2010; 82(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 20215751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and Efficacy of Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients Suspected of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review.
Kessels SJM; Newton SS; Morona JK; Merlin TL
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 51(9):777-788. PubMed ID: 28877081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring: new technique means new questions.
Bhat YM; McGrath KM; Bielefeldt K
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2006 Feb; 40(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 16394871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of data obtained from sedated versus unsedated wireless telemetry capsule placement: does sedation affect the results of ambulatory 48-hour pH testing?
Belafsky PC; Godin DA; Garcia JC; Rahim N
Laryngoscope; 2005 Jun; 115(6):1109-13. PubMed ID: 15933532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonendoscopic transnasal placement of a wireless capsule for esophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a manometry-guided procedure.
Marchese M; Spada C; Iacopini F; Familiari P; Shah SG; Tringali A; Costamagna G
Endoscopy; 2006 Aug; 38(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 17001571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
