234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21537587)
1. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up.
Fernández EM; Martin JA; Angel PA; Mjör IA; Gordan VV; Moncada GA
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 21537587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial.
Moncada G; Martin J; Fernández E; Hempel MC; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Apr; 140(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 19339531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial.
Moncada G; Fernández E; Martín J; Arancibia C; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 18505215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants.
Martin J; Fernandez E; Estay J; Gordan VV; Mjor IA; Moncada G
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 22788726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations.
Gordan VV; Shen C; Riley J; Mjör IA
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(3):144-53; discussion 154. PubMed ID: 16831187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study.
Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mondragon E; Garvan CW; Mjör IA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 21719808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term Performance of Refurbished Amalgam Restorations: 10-year Follow-up.
Moncada G; Fernandez E; Mena K; Vildosola P; Estay J; de Oliveira OB; Martin J; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2017; 15(5):435-445. PubMed ID: 28785746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations.
Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mjör IA
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 16924981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sealing of restorations with marginal defects does not affect their longevity.
Estay J; Martin J; Vildósola P; Villablanca C; Mjör I; de Oliveira OB; Laske M; Loomans B; de Andrade MF; Moncada G; Gordan VV; Opdam N; Fernández E
Am J Dent; 2018 Apr; 31(2):107-112. PubMed ID: 29630796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Longitudinal results of a 10-year clinical trial of repair of amalgam restorations.
Moncada G; Vildósola P; Fernández E; Estay J; de Oliveira Júnior OB; de Andrade MF; Martin J; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 25100406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 12 Years of Repair of Amalgam and Composite Resins: A Clinical Study.
Estay J; Martín J; Viera V; Valdivieso J; Bersezio C; Vildosola P; Mjor IA; Andrade MF; Moraes RR; Moncada G; Gordan VV; Fernández E
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 28976841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Refurbishing Amalgam and Resin Composite Restorations After 12 Years: Controlled Clinical Trial.
Estay J; Martín J; Vildosola P; Mjor IA; Oliveira OB; Andrade MF; Moncada G; Gordan VV; Fernández E
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(6):587-595. PubMed ID: 28857709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A long-term evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of resin-based composite restorations: results of a seven-year study.
Gordan VV; Garvan CW; Blaser PK; Mondragon E; Mjör IA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Dec; 140(12):1476-84. PubMed ID: 19955065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a resin-based sealant with a nano-filled flowable resin composite on sealing performance of marginal defects in resin composites restorations: a 36-months clinical evaluation.
Estay J; Pardo-Díaz C; Reinoso E; Perez-Iñigo J; Martín J; Jorquera G; Kuga M; Fernández E
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6087-6095. PubMed ID: 35608683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal failures of amalgam and composite restorations.
Mjör IA; Qvist V
J Dent; 1997 Jan; 25(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 9080736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
Popoff DA; Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Mjör IA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study.
Casagrande L; Laske M; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MCDNJM; Opdam NJM
J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():30-36. PubMed ID: 28602850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-year clinical performance of dimethacrylatebased composite restorations repaired with a silorane-based composite.
Popoff DA; de Magalhães CS; de Freitas Oliveira W; Soares LA; de Almeida Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Moreira AN; Mjör IA
J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):575-83. PubMed ID: 25516879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
