These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21537587)

  • 21. Seal, replacement or monitoring amalgam restorations with occlusal marginal defects? Results of a 10-year clinical trial.
    Moncada G; Fernández E; Mena K; Martin J; Vildósola P; De Oliveira Junior OB; Estay J; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
    J Dent; 2015 Nov; 43(11):1371-8. PubMed ID: 26231302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings.
    Collins CJ; Bryant RW; Hodge KL
    J Dent; 1998 May; 26(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 9611936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial.
    Moncada GC; Martin J; Fernandez E; Vildosola PG; Caamano C; Caro MJ; Mjor IA; Gordan VV
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(5):314-8. PubMed ID: 17004564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):829-35. PubMed ID: 22771415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material: two-year clinical evaluation.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Vazquez O; Watson RE; Wilson N
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(5):296-302. PubMed ID: 12405585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10785294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial.
    Fernández E; Martín J; Vildósola P; Oliveira Junior OB; Gordan V; Mjor I; Bersezio C; Estay J; de Andrade MF; Moncada G
    J Dent; 2015 Feb; 43(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 24907560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries.
    Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1998 May; 29(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 9693650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years.
    Gordan VV; Mondragon E; Watson RE; Garvan C; Mjör IA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 May; 138(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 17473040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-year prospective clinical performance of a one-step self-etch adhesive and a nanofiller hybrid resin composite in Class V lesions.
    Preussker S; Pöschmann M; Kensche A; Natusch I; Koch R; Klimm W; Hannig C
    Am J Dent; 2014 Apr; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 25000664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
    Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class V carious lesions: 5-year results.
    Demirci M; Sancakli HS; Uysal O
    Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Jun; 12(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 17968599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations.
    Browning WD; Dennison JB
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8957906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.