190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21538394)
1. Ultrastructural investigation of intact orbital implant surfaces using atomic force microscopy.
Choi S; Lee SJ; Shin JH; Cheong Y; Lee HJ; Paek JH; Kim JS; Jin KH; Park HK
Scanning; 2011; 33(4):211-21. PubMed ID: 21538394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fibrovascularization of porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant in a rabbit model.
Jordan DR; Brownstein S; Dorey M; Yuen VH; Gilberg S
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Mar; 20(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 15083083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Porous polymer nanostructures fabricated by the surface-induced phase separation of polymer solutions in anodic aluminum oxide templates.
Wei TH; Chi MH; Tsai CC; Ko HW; Chen JT
Langmuir; 2013 Aug; 29(32):9972-8. PubMed ID: 23879683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Study of the three-dimensional structure and biointegrative characteristics of porous orbital implant materials].
Grusha IaO; Fedorov AA; Baranov PIu; Bakaeva TV; Pavliuk AS
Vestn Oftalmol; 2010; 126(5):9-13. PubMed ID: 21328883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orbital implants insertion to improve ocular prostheses motility.
Goiato MC; Haddad MF; dos Santos DM; Pesqueira AA; Ribeiro Pdo P; Moreno A
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):870-5. PubMed ID: 20485072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bacterial adhesion to dental materials of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) using atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy.
Fang J; Wang C; Li Y; Zhao Z; Mei L
Scanning; 2016 Nov; 38(6):665-670. PubMed ID: 26991988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enucleation with unwrapped porous and nonporous orbital implants: a 15-year experience.
Trichopoulos N; Augsburger JJ
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 21(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 16234693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Behavior of various orbital implants under axial compression.
Jordan DR; Ahuja N; Gilberg S; Bouchard R
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 May; 21(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 15942500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atomic force microscope nanolithography of polymethylmethacrylate polymer.
Teixeira FS; Mansano RD; Salvadori MC; Cattani M; Brown IG
Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 May; 78(5):053702. PubMed ID: 17552820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scanning electron microscopic examination of porous orbital implants.
Mawn LA; Jordan DR; Gilberg S
Can J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 33(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 9660003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cemented fixation with PMMA or Bis-GMA resin hydroxyapatite cement: effect of implant surface roughness.
Walsh WR; Svehla MJ; Russell J; Saito M; Nakashima T; Gillies RM; Bruce W; Hori R
Biomaterials; 2004 Sep; 25(20):4929-34. PubMed ID: 15109853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The bioceramic orbital implant: a new generation of porous implants.
Jordan DR; Mawn LA; Brownstein S; McEachren TM; Gilberg SM; Hill V; Grahovac SZ; Adenis JP
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 16(5):347-55. PubMed ID: 11021384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation.
Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of complication rates of porous anophthalmic orbital implants.
Ramey N; Gupta D; Price K; Husain A; Richard M; Woodward J
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(5):434-40. PubMed ID: 21899247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The control of cell adhesion on a PMMA polymer surface consisting of nanopillar arrays.
Ahn J; Son SJ; Min J
J Biotechnol; 2013 Apr; 164(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 23353729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early Adhesion of Candida albicans onto Dental Acrylic Surfaces.
Aguayo S; Marshall H; Pratten J; Bradshaw D; Brown JS; Porter SR; Spratt D; Bozec L
J Dent Res; 2017 Jul; 96(8):917-923. PubMed ID: 28460191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Porous and nonporous orbital implants for treating the anophthalmic socket: A meta-analysis of case series studies.
Schellini S; Jorge E; Sousa R; Burroughs J; El-Dib R
Orbit; 2016; 35(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 26928263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of nonsolvent on the formation of polymer nanomaterials in the nanopores of anodic aluminum oxide templates.
Lee CW; Wei TH; Chang CW; Chen JT
Macromol Rapid Commun; 2012 Aug; 33(16):1381-7. PubMed ID: 22605615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repair of bone segment defects with surface porous fiber-reinforced polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) composite prosthesis: histomorphometric incorporation model and characterization by SEM.
Hautamäki MP; Aho AJ; Alander P; Rekola J; Gunn J; Strandberg N; Vallittu PK
Acta Orthop; 2008 Aug; 79(4):555-64. PubMed ID: 18766491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
