These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21538885)

  • 1. A posteriori quality control for the curation and reuse of public proteomics data.
    Foster JM; Degroeve S; Gatto L; Visser M; Wang R; Griss J; Apweiler R; Martens L
    Proteomics; 2011 Jun; 11(11):2182-94. PubMed ID: 21538885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PRIDE: quality control in a proteomics data repository.
    Csordas A; Ovelleiro D; Wang R; Foster JM; Ríos D; Vizcaíno JA; Hermjakob H
    Database (Oxford); 2012; 2012():bas004. PubMed ID: 22434838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proteomics data exchange and storage: the need for common standards and public repositories.
    Jiménez RC; Vizcaíno JA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1007():317-33. PubMed ID: 23666733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proteomics data collection (ProDaC): publishing and collecting proteomics data sets in public repositories using standard formats.
    Stephan C; Eisenacher M; Kohl M; Meyer HE
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 604():345-68. PubMed ID: 20013383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Submitting proteomics data to PRIDE using PRIDE Converter.
    Barsnes H; Vizcaíno JA; Reisinger F; Eidhammer I; Martens L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 694():237-53. PubMed ID: 21082439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The PRIDE proteomics identifications database: data submission, query, and dataset comparison.
    Jones P; Côté R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 484():287-303. PubMed ID: 18592187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PRIDE: the proteomics identifications database.
    Martens L; Hermjakob H; Jones P; Adamski M; Taylor C; States D; Gevaert K; Vandekerckhove J; Apweiler R
    Proteomics; 2005 Aug; 5(13):3537-45. PubMed ID: 16041671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molecular interactions and data standardisation.
    Orchard S; Kerrien S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 604():309-18. PubMed ID: 20013380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The HUPO proteomics standards initiative--overcoming the fragmentation of proteomics data.
    Hermjakob H
    Proteomics; 2006 Sep; 6 Suppl 2():34-8. PubMed ID: 17031794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistics in experimental design, preprocessing, and analysis of proteomics data.
    Jung K
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 696():259-72. PubMed ID: 21063953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PRIDE: a public repository of protein and peptide identifications for the proteomics community.
    Jones P; Côté RG; Martens L; Quinn AF; Taylor CF; Derache W; Hermjakob H; Apweiler R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jan; 34(Database issue):D659-63. PubMed ID: 16381953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recent developments in public proteomic MS repositories and pipelines.
    Mead JA; Bianco L; Bessant C
    Proteomics; 2009 Feb; 9(4):861-81. PubMed ID: 19212957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The HUPO proteomics standards initiative--easing communication and minimizing data loss in a changing world.
    Orchard S; Hermjakob H
    Brief Bioinform; 2008 Mar; 9(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 18065433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data standardization by the HUPO-PSI: how has the community benefitted?
    Orchard S; Hermjakob H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 696():149-60. PubMed ID: 21063946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PRIDE and "Database on Demand" as valuable tools for computational proteomics.
    Vizcaíno JA; Reisinger F; Côté R; Martens L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 696():93-105. PubMed ID: 21063943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. BNDb--Biomolecules Nucleus Database: an integrated proteomics and transcriptomics database.
    Faria-Campos AC; Gomes RR; Moratelli FS; Rausch-Fernandes H; Franco GR; Campos SV
    Genet Mol Res; 2007 Oct; 6(4):937-45. PubMed ID: 18058714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The proteios software environment: an extensible multiuser platform for management and analysis of proteomics data.
    Häkkinen J; Vincic G; Månsson O; Wårell K; Levander F
    J Proteome Res; 2009 Jun; 8(6):3037-43. PubMed ID: 19354269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do we want our data raw? Including binary mass spectrometry data in public proteomics data repositories.
    Martens L; Nesvizhskii AI; Hermjakob H; Adamski M; Omenn GS; Vandekerckhove J; Gevaert K
    Proteomics; 2005 Aug; 5(13):3501-5. PubMed ID: 16041670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using the PRIDE proteomics identifications database for knowledge discovery and data analysis.
    Jones P; Martens L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 604():297-307. PubMed ID: 20013379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective representation and storage of mass spectrometry-based proteomic data sets for the scientific community.
    Olsen JV; Mann M
    Sci Signal; 2011 Feb; 4(160):pe7. PubMed ID: 21325203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.