377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21540126)
1. Evaluation of performance of some enrichment designs dealing with high placebo response in psychiatric clinical trials.
Chen YF; Yang Y; Hung HM; Wang SJ
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jul; 32(4):592-604. PubMed ID: 21540126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MMRM versus MI in dealing with missing data--a comparison based on 25 NDA data sets.
Siddiqui O
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):423-36. PubMed ID: 21442517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MMRM vs. LOCF: a comprehensive comparison based on simulation study and 25 NDA datasets.
Siddiqui O; Hung HM; O'Neill R
J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):227-46. PubMed ID: 19212876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An examination of the efficiency of the sequential parallel design in psychiatric clinical trials.
Tamura RN; Huang X
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 17848492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploratory analyses of efficacy data from major depressive disorder trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration in support of new drug applications.
Khin NA; Chen YF; Yang Y; Yang P; Laughren TP
J Clin Psychiatry; 2011 Apr; 72(4):464-72. PubMed ID: 21527123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An overview of practical approaches for handling missing data in clinical trials.
DeSouza CM; Legedza AT; Sankoh AJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Nov; 19(6):1055-73. PubMed ID: 20183464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modelling placebo response in depression trials using a longitudinal model with informative dropout.
Gomeni R; Lavergne A; Merlo-Pich E
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Jan; 36(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 19041717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simple options for improving signal detection in antidepressant clinical trials.
Mallinckrodt CH; Meyers AL; Prakash A; Faries DE; Detke MJ
Psychopharmacol Bull; 2007; 40(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 17514189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increasing trial efficiency by early reallocation of placebo nonresponders in sequential parallel comparison designs: application to antidepressant trials.
Boessen R; Knol MJ; Groenwold RH; Grobbee DE; Roes KC
Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):578-87. PubMed ID: 23060319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test designs with substantial dropout rates.
Salim A; Mackinnon A; Christensen H; Griffiths K
Psychiatry Res; 2008 Sep; 160(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18718673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Handling drop-out in longitudinal clinical trials: a comparison of the LOCF and MMRM approaches.
Lane P
Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(2):93-106. PubMed ID: 17351897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A bias correction in testing treatment efficacy under informative dropout in clinical trials.
Kong F; Chen YF; Jin K
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Nov; 19(6):980-1000. PubMed ID: 20183460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparisons of methods for analysis of repeated binary responses with missing data.
Frank Liu G; Zhan X
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):371-92. PubMed ID: 21442514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving efficiency of ALS clinical trials using lead-in designs.
Moore DH; Miller RG
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord; 2004 Sep; 5 Suppl 1():57-60. PubMed ID: 15512875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
Morgan CC
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semi-parametric and non-parametric methods for clinical trials with incomplete data.
O'Brien PC; Zhang D; Bailey KR
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):341-58. PubMed ID: 15547952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple imputation techniques in small sample clinical trials.
Barnes SA; Lindborg SR; Seaman JW
Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(2):233-45. PubMed ID: 16220515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors that influence the outcome of placebo-controlled antidepressant clinical trials.
Niklson IA; Reimitz PE; Sennef C
Psychopharmacol Bull; 1997; 33(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 9133750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiple imputation compared with some informative dropout procedures in the estimation and comparison of rates of change in longitudinal clinical trials with dropouts.
Ali MW; Siddiqui O
J Biopharm Stat; 2000 May; 10(2):165-81. PubMed ID: 10803723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The enrichment window approach as a means of dealing with placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials.
Mallinckrodt CH; Prucka WR
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Nov; 88(5):592-4. PubMed ID: 20959845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
