136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2154013)
1. [Staging of cervix cancer using MRT].
Einspieler R; Ebner F; Hofmann HM; Ranner G; Tamussino K; Justich E
Rofo; 1990 Jan; 152(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 2154013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.
deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Uterine cervix cancers: staging by magnetic resonance imaging].
Bartoli JM; Moulin G; Di Stefano-Louineau D; Gaubert JY; Delannoy L; Delpero JR; Blanc B; Kasbarian M
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1990; 33(4-5):241-7. PubMed ID: 2268127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (stage IB-IIB): evaluation using magnetic resonance].
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni L; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 2236692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [MRI findings of uterine cervical cancer and value of MRI in preoperative staging].
Li XC; Shang JB; Wu XM; Zeng QS; Sun CP; He JX; Zhong ZW; Chen ZS
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Mar; 27(3):352-4. PubMed ID: 17425990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of parametrial involvement in carcinoma of the cervix uteri].
Fischetti SG; Coppolino F; Priolo GD; Chiarenza R; Garufi A; Privitera G; Materazzo S; Loreto C
Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):470-9. PubMed ID: 1767055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management.
Dhoot NM; Kumar V; Shinagare A; Kataki AC; Barmon D; Bhuyan U
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22339747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement.
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni GL; DelMaschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Apr; 156(4):753-6. PubMed ID: 2003441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical stage I carcinoma of the cervix. Value of MR imaging in determining invasion into the parametrium.
Lien HH; Blomlie V; Iversen T; Tropé C; Sundfør K; Abeler VM
Acta Radiol; 1993 Mar; 34(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 8452717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging--a realistic option.
Booth SJ; Turnbull LW; Poole DR; Richmond I
BJOG; 2008 Jun; 115(7):894-901. PubMed ID: 18485169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix].
Pellegrino A; Cormio G; Maneo A; Vanzulli A; Villa G; Lissoni A; Landoni F
Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Dec; 47(12):523-6. PubMed ID: 8720972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of tumor volume in cervical cancer by magnetic resonance imaging.
Narayan K; McKenzie A; Fisher R; Susil B; Jobling T; Bernshaw D
Am J Clin Oncol; 2003 Oct; 26(5):e163-8. PubMed ID: 14528092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.
Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Coakley F; Reinhold C; Thomas G; Amendola M; Schwartz LH; Woodward P; Pannu H; Hricak H
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(36):5687-94. PubMed ID: 17179104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with carcinoma of the cervix (a pilot study).
Soeters RP; Beningfield SJ; Dehaeck K; Levin W; Bloch B
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Apr; 17(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 2015918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI.
Kaji Y; Sugimura K; Kitao M; Ishida T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 8089330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to clinical staging in cervical carcinoma.
Bhosale P; Peungjesada S; Devine C; Balachandran A; Iyer R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 21084900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR staging in carcinoma of the endometrium and carcinoma of the cervix.
Pakkal MV; Rudralingam V; McCluggage WG; Kelly BE
Ulster Med J; 2004 May; 73(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 15244121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
