448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21540443)
1. Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the Ontario breast screening program.
Kirsh VA; Chiarelli AM; Edwards SA; O'Malley FP; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jun; 103(12):942-50. PubMed ID: 21540443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection.
Chiarelli AM; Kirsh VA; Klar NS; Shumak R; Jong R; Fishell E; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1856-62. PubMed ID: 17035392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
Porter PL; El-Bastawissi AY; Mandelson MT; Lin MG; Khalid N; Watney EA; Cousens L; White D; Taplin S; White E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1999 Dec; 91(23):2020-8. PubMed ID: 10580027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Favourable prognostic factors of subsequent screen-detected breast cancers among women aged 50-69.
Chiarelli AM; Edwards SA; Sheppard AJ; Mirea L; Chong N; Paszat L; Shumak RS; Oʼmalley FP;
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2012 Nov; 21(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 22273849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program.
Prummel MV; Done SJ; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Holloway CM; Chiarelli AM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25108740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of clinical-pathologic characteristics and outcomes of true interval and screen-detected invasive breast cancer among participants of a Canadian breast screening program: a nested case-control study.
Rayson D; Payne JI; Abdolell M; Barnes PJ; MacIntosh RF; Foley T; Younis T; Burns A; Caines J
Clin Breast Cancer; 2011 Mar; 11(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 21421519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer detected at screening and between mammographic screens.
Hofvind S; Møller B; Thoresen S; Ursin G
Int J Cancer; 2006 Jun; 118(12):3112-7. PubMed ID: 16395702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density.
Holm J; Humphreys K; Li J; Ploner A; Cheddad A; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Czene K
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(9):1030-7. PubMed ID: 25646195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
Mandelson MT; Oestreicher N; Porter PL; White D; Finder CA; Taplin SH; White E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jul; 92(13):1081-7. PubMed ID: 10880551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A basal epithelial phenotype is more frequent in interval breast cancers compared with screen detected tumors.
Collett K; Stefansson IM; Eide J; Braaten A; Wang H; Eide GE; Thoresen SØ; Foulkes WD; Akslen LA
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1108-12. PubMed ID: 15894660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of clinical-pathological characteristics between symptomatic and interval breast cancer.
Meshkat B; Prichard RS; Al-Hilli Z; Bass GA; Quinn C; O'Doherty A; Rothwell J; Geraghty J; Evoy D; McDermott EW
Breast; 2015 Jun; 24(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 25771080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.
Miglioretti DL; Zhu W; Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Onega T; Buist DS; Henderson LM; Smith RA;
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Nov; 1(8):1069-77. PubMed ID: 26501844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using mammographic density to improve breast cancer screening outcomes.
Kavanagh AM; Byrnes GB; Nickson C; Cawson JN; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Gertig DM; English DR
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Oct; 17(10):2818-24. PubMed ID: 18843028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years.
Buist DS; Porter PL; Lehman C; Taplin SH; White E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(19):1432-40. PubMed ID: 15467032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumor characteristics in screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers.
Pálka I; Kelemen G; Ormándi K; Lázár G; Nyári T; Thurzó L; Kahán Z
Pathol Oncol Res; 2008 Jun; 14(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 18347932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Organized screening detects breast cancer at earlier stage regardless of molecular phenotype.
Holloway CMB; Jiang L; Whitehead M; Racz JM; Groome PA
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 Sep; 144(9):1769-1775. PubMed ID: 29909564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics.
Aiello EJ; Buist DS; White E; Porter PL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Mar; 14(3):662-8. PubMed ID: 15767347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Independent prognostic value of screen detection in invasive breast cancer.
Mook S; Van 't Veer LJ; Rutgers EJ; Ravdin PM; van de Velde AO; van Leeuwen FE; Visser O; Schmidt MK
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Apr; 103(7):585-97. PubMed ID: 21350218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
