103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2154085)
1. Aerosols and protective clothing.
Spurny KR; Schoermann J; Opiela H
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Jan; 51(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 2154085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Review of chamber design requirements for testing of personal protective clothing ensembles.
Gao P; King WP; Shaffer R
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Aug; 4(8):562-71. PubMed ID: 17558802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Collection of silica and asbestos aerosols by respirators at steady and cyclic flow.
Brosseau LM; Ellenbecker MJ; Evans JS
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Aug; 51(8):420-6. PubMed ID: 2168122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The European standard for sun-protective clothing: EN 13758.
Gambichler T; Laperre J; Hoffmann K
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2006 Feb; 20(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 16441617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency of five chemical protective clothing materials against nano and submicron aerosols when submitted to mechanical deformations.
Ben Salah M; Hallé S; Tuduri L
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016; 13(6):425-33. PubMed ID: 26786065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of nano- and submicron particle penetration through ten nonwoven fabrics using a wind-driven approach.
Gao P; Jaques PA; Hsiao TC; Shepherd A; Eimer BC; Yang M; Miller A; Gupta B; Shaffer R
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jan; 8(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 21154104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Penetration of respirator filters by an asbestos aerosol.
Ortiz LW; Soderholm SC; Valdez FO
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Sep; 49(9):451-60. PubMed ID: 3177224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of the protective performance of a positive pressure bio-protective clothing against viral aerosol].
Li N; Wen ZB; Yang WH; Wang J; Li JS; Hu LF; Dong XK; Liu KY; Cao J
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 46(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 22490144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Special considerations for conducting permeation testing of protective clothing materials with gases and chemical vapors.
Stull JO; Pinette MF
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 May; 51(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 2346117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators by photometric and number-based test methods.
Rengasamy S; Miller A; Eimer BC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jan; 8(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 21154105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the risk to health in the exposure to asbestos, by means of scanning electron microscopy.
Tat M; Dumitru-Stănescu R; Bunescu C; Niţă P
Sante Publique (Bucur); 1989; 32(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 2546259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A Novel Method of Safely Measuring Influenza Virus Aerosol Using Antigen-Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Performance Evaluation of Protective Clothing Materials.
Shimasaki N; Nojima Y; Okaue A; Takahashi H; Kageyama T; Hamamoto I; Shinohara K
Biocontrol Sci; 2016; 21(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 27350426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of chrysotile and crocidolite fibres with infrared spectrophotometry: application to asbestos-cement products.
Valerio F; Balducci D
IARC Sci Publ; 1989; (90):197-204. PubMed ID: 2545609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Filtering performances of 20 protective fabrics against solid aerosols.
Wingert L; Cloutier Y; Hallé S; Bahloul A; Tessier D; Giraudel JL; Dolez P; Tuduri L
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Aug; 16(8):592-606. PubMed ID: 31283417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of particle charge on the performance of a filtering facepiece.
Chen CC; Huang SH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Apr; 59(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 9586197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiency of sampling and analysis of asbestos fibers on filter media: implications for exposure assessment.
Vallero DA; Kominsky JR; Beard ME; Crankshaw OS
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Jan; 6(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 19037817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental evaluation of personal protection devices against graphite nanoaerosols: fibrous filter media, masks, protective clothing, and gloves.
Golanski L; Guiot A; Rouillon F; Pocachard J; Tardif F
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2009 Jun; 28(6-7):353-9. PubMed ID: 19755446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a double-layered ceramic filter for aerosol filtration at high-temperatures: the filter collection efficiency.
de Freitas NL; Gonçalves JA; Innocentini MD; Coury JR
J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(3):747-56. PubMed ID: 16466854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a passive method for determining particle penetration through protective clothing materials.
Jaques PA; Portnoff L
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Dec; 14(12):995-1002. PubMed ID: 28699827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A variable feed rate mechanism for fluidized bed asbestos generators.
Sussman RG; Gearhart JM; Lippmann M
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Jan; 46(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2992261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
