BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21540864)

  • 21. HER2 equivocal breast cancer that is positive by alternative probe HER2 FISH are classified as HER2 negative by Oncotype DX.
    Tozbikian GH; Zynger DL
    Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):535-540. PubMed ID: 29498449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Chromogenic
    Ali AHM; Yahya AQ; Mohammed HL
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Jun; 7(12):1917-1925. PubMed ID: 31406529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An alternative and sensitive method based on LCM and Q-PCR for HER2 testing in breast cancer.
    Fetica B; Balacescu O; Balacescu L; Rus M; Berindan-Neagoe I
    Cancer Biomark; 2014; 14(2-3):129-35. PubMed ID: 24878813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High false-negative rate of HER2 quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of the Oncotype DX test: an independent quality assurance study.
    Dabbs DJ; Klein ME; Mohsin SK; Tubbs RR; Shuai Y; Bhargava R
    J Clin Oncol; 2011 Nov; 29(32):4279-85. PubMed ID: 21990395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing HER2 amplification by IHC, FISH, and real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis (real-time PCR) following LCM in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue from 40 women with ovarian cancer.
    Hillig T; Thode J; Breinholt MF; Franzmann MB; Pedersen C; Lund F; Mygind H; Sölétormos G; Rudnicki M
    APMIS; 2012 Dec; 120(12):1000-7. PubMed ID: 23030524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Chromogenic in situ hybridisation for the assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: an international validation ring study.
    van de Vijver M; Bilous M; Hanna W; Hofmann M; Kristel P; Penault-Llorca F; Rüschoff J
    Breast Cancer Res; 2007; 9(5):R68. PubMed ID: 17922920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of HER-2 status in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: correlation of immunohistochemistry, quantitative real-time RT-PCR, and FISH with aneuploidy and survival.
    Saxby AJ; Nielsen A; Scarlett CJ; Clarkson A; Morey A; Gill A; Smith RC
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2005 Sep; 29(9):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16096400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?
    Bethune GC; Pettit AS; Veldhuijzen van Zanten D; Barnes PJ
    Histopathology; 2017 May; 70(6):966-974. PubMed ID: 28032917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. HER2 status in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas assessed by two rabbit monoclonal antibodies (SP3 and 4B5) and two in situ hybridization methods (FISH and SISH).
    Boers JE; Meeuwissen H; Methorst N
    Histopathology; 2011 Feb; 58(3):383-94. PubMed ID: 21323962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of HER2 status by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry to predict benefit from dose escalation of adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy in node-positive breast cancer patients.
    Dressler LG; Berry DA; Broadwater G; Cowan D; Cox K; Griffin S; Miller A; Tse J; Novotny D; Persons DL; Barcos M; Henderson IC; Liu ET; Thor A; Budman D; Muss H; Norton L; Hayes DF
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jul; 23(19):4287-97. PubMed ID: 15994142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of analytical accuracy of HER2 status in patients with breast cancer: Comparison of HER2 GPA with HER2 IHC and HER2 FISH.
    Jensen SG; Thomas PE; Christensen IJ; Balslev E; Hansen A; Høgdall E
    APMIS; 2020 Nov; 128(11):573-582. PubMed ID: 32860265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical utility of RT-PCR in assessing HER 2 gene expression versus traditional IHC and FISH in breast cancer patients.
    Suryavanshi M; Mehta A; Jaipuria J; Kumar D; Vishwakarma G; Panigrahi MK; Verma H; Saifi M; Sharma S; Tandon S; Doval DC; Das BC
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Jul; 25(4):416-430. PubMed ID: 29427123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. HER2 Status by Standardized Immunohistochemistry and Silver-Enhanced In Situ Hybridization in Korean Breast Cancer.
    Bae YK; Gong G; Kang J; Lee A; Cho EY; Lee JS; Suh KS; Lee DW; Jung WH;
    J Breast Cancer; 2012 Dec; 15(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 23346165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development and evaluation of a novel RT-qPCR based test for the quantification of HER2 gene expression in breast cancer.
    El Hadi H; Abdellaoui-Maane I; Kottwitz D; El Amrani M; Bouchoutrouch N; Qmichou Z; Karkouri M; ElAttar H; Errihani H; Fernandez PL; Bakri Y; Sefrioui H; Moumen A
    Gene; 2017 Mar; 605():114-122. PubMed ID: 28039034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastric carcinoma: issues related to heterogeneity in biopsies and resections.
    Lee S; de Boer WB; Fermoyle S; Platten M; Kumarasinghe MP
    Histopathology; 2011 Nov; 59(5):832-40. PubMed ID: 22092394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between pathological features, HER2 protein expression and HER2 and CEP17 copy number in breast cancer: biological and methodological considerations.
    Lambein K; Praet M; Forsyth R; Van den Broecke R; Braems G; Matthys B; Cocquyt V; Denys H; Pauwels P; Libbrecht L
    J Clin Pathol; 2011 Mar; 64(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 21177747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Chromogenic In Situ Hybridisation Test for Breast Cancer Patients with Equivocal IHC Results--a Study from Iran.
    Mehrazma M; Kalantari E; Rezvani H; Bahar B; Basi A; Razavi SM; Rakhshani N
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(17):7695-700. PubMed ID: 26625783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
    Varga Z; Noske A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detection of Gene Amplification by Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification in Comparison with In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry.
    Tabarestani S; Ghaderian SM; Rezvani H
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(17):7997-8002. PubMed ID: 26625832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Her2 amplification status in Iranian breast cancer patients: comparison of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).
    Ghaffari SR; Sabokbar T; Dastan J; Rafati M; Moossavi S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):1031-4. PubMed ID: 21790246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.