These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21541262)

  • 1. Self-informant Agreement for Personality and Evaluative Person Descriptors: Comparing Methods for Creating Informant Measures.
    Simms LJ; Zelazny K; Yam WH; Gros DF
    Eur J Pers; 2010 May; 24(3):207-221. PubMed ID: 21541262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Target-, informant-, and meta-perceptual ratings of maladaptive traits.
    Yalch MM; Hopwood CJ
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Sep; 29(9):1142-1156. PubMed ID: 27831728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Associations between informant ratings of personality disorder traits, self-reports of personality, and directly observed behavior.
    Kaurin A; Sauerberger KS; Funder DC
    J Pers; 2018 Dec; 86(6):1078-1101. PubMed ID: 29498425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insight and the Dark Triad: Comparing self- and meta-perceptions in relation to psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism.
    Maples-Keller JL; Miller JD
    Personal Disord; 2018 Jan; 9(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 27505190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When father doesn't know best: selective disagreement between self-report and informant report of the broad autism phenotype in parents of a child with autism.
    Sasson NJ; Faso DJ; Parlier M; Daniels JL; Piven J
    Autism Res; 2014 Dec; 7(6):731-9. PubMed ID: 25339495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-Other Agreement in Personality Reports: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Self- and Informant-Report Means.
    Kim H; Di Domenico SI; Connelly BS
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Jan; 30(1):129-138. PubMed ID: 30481113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: the big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self.
    John OP; Robins RW
    J Pers; 1993 Dec; 61(4):521-51. PubMed ID: 8151500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity: the role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity.
    Watson D; Hubbard B; Wiese D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Mar; 78(3):546-58. PubMed ID: 10743880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The letter of recommendation effect in informant ratings of personality.
    Leising D; Erbs J; Fritz U
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Apr; 98(4):668-82. PubMed ID: 20307137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Convergence of Self-Reports and Informant Reports on the Personality Assessment Screener.
    Kelley SE; Edens JF; Morey LC
    Assessment; 2017 Dec; 24(8):999-1007. PubMed ID: 26951323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective self- and informant-personality associations with inflammation, health behaviors, and health indicators.
    Wright AJ; Weston SJ; Norton S; Voss M; Bogdan R; Oltmanns TF; Jackson JJ
    Health Psychol; 2022 Feb; 41(2):121-133. PubMed ID: 35238582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric Comparison of Self- and Informant-Reports of Personality.
    Olino TM; Klein DN
    Assessment; 2015 Dec; 22(6):655-64. PubMed ID: 25612626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informant assessment: The Informant Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory.
    Oltmanns JR; Crego C; Widiger TA
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Jan; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 29323512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the validity of informant and self-reports of personality using laboratory indices of emotional responding as criterion variables.
    Lieberman L; Liu H; Huggins AA; Katz AC; Zvolensky MJ; Shankman SA
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Sep; 53(9):1386-97. PubMed ID: 27273802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Personality change: Longitudinal self-other agreement and convergence with retrospective-reports.
    Oltmanns JR; Jackson JJ; Oltmanns TF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 May; 118(5):1065-1079. PubMed ID: 30843725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self- and informant perceptions of psychopathic traits in relation to the triarchic model.
    Kelley SE; Edens JF; Donnellan MB; Mowle EN; Sörman K
    J Pers; 2018 Aug; 86(4):738-751. PubMed ID: 29023777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self and informant ratings of SCID-II Personality Disorder items for nonreferred college women: effects of item and participant characteristics.
    McKeeman JL; Erickson MT
    J Clin Psychol; 1997 Oct; 53(6):523-33. PubMed ID: 9316807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incremental validity of positive and negative valence in predicting personality disorder.
    Simms LJ; Yufik T; Gros DF
    Personal Disord; 2010 Apr; 1(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 20730038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The incremental validity of average state self-reports over global self-reports of personality.
    Finnigan KM; Vazire S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Aug; 115(2):321-337. PubMed ID: 28277717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Role of Personality in the Mental and Physical Health of World Trade Center Responders: Self- versus Informant-Reports.
    Oltmanns JR; Ruggero C; Miao J; Waszczuk M; Yang Y; Clouston SAP; Bromet EJ; Luft BJ; Kotov R
    Clin Psychol Sci; 2022; 1():. PubMed ID: 36407479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.