These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21541691)

  • 1. Extracting insights from electronic health records: case studies, a visual analytics process model, and design recommendations.
    Wang TD; Wongsuphasawat K; Plaisant C; Shneiderman B
    J Med Syst; 2011 Oct; 35(5):1135-52. PubMed ID: 21541691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for cohort selection of cardiovascular disease records from an electronic health record system.
    Abrahão MTF; Nobre MRC; Gutierrez MA
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jun; 102():138-149. PubMed ID: 28495342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of a problem-oriented view on clinical data retrieval.
    Semanik MG; Kleinschmidt PC; Wright A; Willett DL; Dean SM; Saleh SN; Co Z; Sampene E; Buchanan JR
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Apr; 28(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 33566093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Improvement of the Electronic Health Record User Experience by Screen Design Principles.
    Fujita K; Onishi K; Takemura T; Kuroda T
    J Med Syst; 2019 Dec; 44(1):21. PubMed ID: 31823092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
    Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Innovative information visualization of electronic health record data: a systematic review.
    West VL; Borland D; Hammond WE
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Mar; 22(2):330-9. PubMed ID: 25336597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Graphical display of diagnostic test results in electronic health records: a comparison of 8 systems.
    Sittig DF; Murphy DR; Smith MW; Russo E; Wright A; Singh H
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Jul; 22(4):900-4. PubMed ID: 25792704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping the Electronic Health Record: A Method to Study Display Fragmentation.
    Senathirajah Y; Wang J; Borycki E; Kushniruk A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():1138-1142. PubMed ID: 29295280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visualization of medical data based on EHR standards.
    Kopanitsa G; Hildebrand C; Stausberg J; Englmeier KH
    Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 23223709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bringing service design to the development of health information systems: The case of the Portuguese national electronic health record.
    Grenha Teixeira J; Pinho NF; Patrício L
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Dec; 132():103942. PubMed ID: 31627031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of two different electronic health record user interfaces on intensive care provider task load, errors of cognition, and performance.
    Ahmed A; Chandra S; Herasevich V; Gajic O; Pickering BW
    Crit Care Med; 2011 Jul; 39(7):1626-34. PubMed ID: 21478739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of a prototype visualization tool for new information in EHR clinical documents.
    Farri O; Rahman A; Monsen KA; Zhang R; Pakhomov SV; Pieczkiewicz DS; Speedie SM; Melton GB
    Appl Clin Inform; 2012; 3(4):404-18. PubMed ID: 23646087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physician experiences of screen-level features in a prominent electronic health record: Design recommendations from a qualitative study.
    Khairat S; Coleman C; Teal R; Rezk S; Rand V; Bice T; Carson SS
    Health Informatics J; 2021; 27(1):1460458221997914. PubMed ID: 33691524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Higher accuracy of complex medication reconciliation through improved design of electronic tools.
    Horsky J; Drucker EA; Ramelson HZ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 May; 25(5):465-475. PubMed ID: 29121197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting physicians' use of a dedicated overview interface in an electronic health record: The importance of standard information and standard documentation.
    Jensen LG; Bossen C
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():44-53. PubMed ID: 26806711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative observational study of inpatient clinical note-entry and reading/retrieval styles adopted by physicians.
    Rizvi RF; Harder KA; Hultman GM; Adam TJ; Kim M; Pakhomov SV; Melton GB
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Jun; 90():1-11. PubMed ID: 27103191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public and physician's expectations and ethical concerns about electronic health record: Benefits outweigh risks except for information security.
    Entzeridou E; Markopoulou E; Mollaki V
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Feb; 110():98-107. PubMed ID: 29331259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An object oriented user interface for analysis of biological data.
    Dietz MA; Grant AO; Starmer CF
    Comput Biomed Res; 1990 Feb; 23(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 2306936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visualization of CDA laboratory reports and long term trends as a possible EHR application for patients and physicians.
    Obenaus M; Burgsteiner H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 198():93-100. PubMed ID: 24825690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.