219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21541962)
1. Implementation and evaluation of a docking-rescoring method using molecular footprint comparisons.
Balius TE; Mukherjee S; Rizzo RC
J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2273-89. PubMed ID: 21541962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategies for lead discovery: application of footprint similarity targeting HIVgp41.
Holden PM; Allen WJ; Gochin M; Rizzo RC
Bioorg Med Chem; 2014 Jan; 22(1):651-61. PubMed ID: 24315195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Grid-based molecular footprint comparison method for docking and de novo design: application to HIVgp41.
Balius TE; Allen WJ; Mukherjee S; Rizzo RC
J Comput Chem; 2013 May; 34(14):1226-1240. PubMed ID: 23436713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Docking pose selection by interaction pattern graph similarity: application to the D3R grand challenge 2015.
Slynko I; Da Silva F; Bret G; Rognan D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):669-683. PubMed ID: 27480696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pharmacophore-based similarity scoring for DOCK.
Jiang L; Rizzo RC
J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):1083-102. PubMed ID: 25229837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficient conformational sampling and weak scoring in docking programs? Strategy of the wisdom of crowds.
Chaput L; Mouawad L
J Cheminform; 2017 Jun; 9(1):37. PubMed ID: 29086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local Interaction Density (LID), a Fast and Efficient Tool to Prioritize Docking Poses.
Jacquemard C; Tran-Nguyen VK; Drwal MN; Rognan D; Kellenberger E
Molecules; 2019 Jul; 24(14):. PubMed ID: 31323745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Target-specific native/decoy pose classifier improves the accuracy of ligand ranking in the CSAR 2013 benchmark.
Fourches D; Politi R; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jan; 55(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 25521713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Negative Image-Based Rescoring: Using Cavity Information to Improve Docking Screening.
Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():141-154. PubMed ID: 33759125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ES-Screen: A Novel Electrostatics-Driven Method for Drug Discovery Virtual Screening.
Issa NT; Byers SW; Dakshanamurthy S
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(23):. PubMed ID: 36499162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid Rescoring and Refinement of Ligand-Receptor Complexes Using Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics with a Monte Carlo Pose Reservoir.
Alcantara J; Chiu K; Bickel JD; Rizzo RC; Simmerling C
J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Nov; 19(21):7934-7945. PubMed ID: 37831619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved pose and affinity predictions using different protocols tailored on the basis of data availability.
Prathipati P; Nagao C; Ahmad S; Mizuguchi K
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):817-828. PubMed ID: 27714493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.
Graves AP; Shivakumar DM; Boyce SE; Jacobson MP; Case DA; Shoichet BK
J Mol Biol; 2008 Mar; 377(3):914-34. PubMed ID: 18280498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Boosting Pose Ranking Performance via Rescoring with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Lewis RA; Ertl P
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2016 Sep; 88(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 27061970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
