These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21542428)

  • 1. Fetal acoustic stimulation test for early intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Goonewardene M; Hanwellage K
    Ceylon Med J; 2011 Mar; 56(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 21542428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The fetal acoustic stimulation test: a reliable and cost effective method of antepartum fetal monitoring.
    Batcha TM; Goonewardene IM
    Ceylon Med J; 2005 Dec; 50(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 16538910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.
    Xi Q; Du J; Liu X; Shao L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal acoustic stimulation for rapid intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y; Wacharaprechanont T; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1993 Nov; 76(11):606-12. PubMed ID: 7964235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Search for the most predictive tests of fetal well-being in early labor.
    Chua S; Arulkumaran S; Kurup A; Anandakumar C; Selemat N; Ratnam SS
    J Perinat Med; 1996; 24(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 8827567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vibro-acoustic stimulation in high-risk pregnancies; maternal perception of fetal movements, fetal heart rate and fetal outcome.
    Nyman M; Arulkumaran S; Jakobsson J; Westgren M
    J Perinat Med; 1992; 20(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 1432550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal perception of sound provoked fetal movement for antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Chittacharoen A; Herabutya Y; Tungsagonwattana S; Suthutvoravut S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Dec; 23(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 9433045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Broussard P; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Feb; 33(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 3351822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of antenatal fetal acoustic stimulation.
    Schwartz DB; Sherman SJ; Goyert GL; Fields P; Simkins S; Daoud Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1991 Jul; 40(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 2070957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the effects of acoustic stimulation and feeding mother stimulation on non-reactive non-stress test: a randomized clinical trial.
    Hasanpour S; Raouf S; Shamsalizadeh N; Bani S; Ghojazadeh M; Sheikhan F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1105-10. PubMed ID: 23329342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short fetal acoustic stimulation test for rapid antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y; Kittipibul V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 11460963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The predictive value of fetal acoustic stimulation.
    Saraçoğlu F; Göl K; Sahin I; Türkkani B; Oztopçu C
    J Perinatol; 1999 Mar; 19(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 10642968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using fetal scalp stimulation with Doppler ultrasonography to enhance intermittent auscultation in low-resource settings: a diagnostic trial from Tanzania.
    Goodman DM; Mlay P; Thielman N; Small MJ; Schmitt JW
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 30760224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Doppler velocimetry and nonstress test for predicting outcome of pregnancies with decreased fetal movements.
    Dubiel M; Gudmundsson S; Thuring-Jönsson A; Maesel A; Marsal K
    Am J Perinatol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 9259915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of fetal well-being by vibro-acoustic stimulation test].
    Sun DW; Chen XX; Gai MY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Jun; 29(6):322-4, 380. PubMed ID: 8001402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antepartum fetal wellbeing.
    Chutiwongse S; Tannirandorn Y; Sukcharoen N; Witoonpanich P; Snidvongs W; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1991 May; 74(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 1783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal vibro-acoustic stimulation with a can--a clinical study.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Lawrie TA; de Jager M; da Ponte A
    S Afr Med J; 1998 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):199-200, 203. PubMed ID: 9542487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement in the early intrapartum period.
    Chittacharoen A; Srijhantuik K; Suthutvoravut S; Herabutya Y
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Feb; 56(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 9061386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal surveillance in diabetic pregnancy. I. Predictive value of the nonstress test.
    Olofsson P; Sjöberg NO; Solum T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 3739630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The use of acoustic stimuli for assessing fetal status ante- and intranatally].
    Samodurov PS
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Nov; (11):33-6. PubMed ID: 1814224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.