These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21542723)

  • 1. Reliability of the integrated radiograph-photograph method to obtain natural head position in cephalometric diagnosis.
    Dvortsin DP; Ye Q; Pruim GJ; Dijkstra PU; Ren Y
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):889-94. PubMed ID: 21542723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of 3D reproduction of natural head position using three different manual reorientation methods compared to 3D software.
    Yang HJ; Han JJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1625-1630. PubMed ID: 29970284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of head position on cephalometric evaluation of the soft-tissue facial profile.
    Hoogeveen RC; Sanderink GC; Berkhout WE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(6):20120423. PubMed ID: 23412462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in natural head position after orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III patients.
    Cho D; Choi DS; Jang I; Cha BK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 26038079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natural head posture--considerations of reproducibility.
    Bister D; Edler RJ; Tom BD; Prevost AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):457-70. PubMed ID: 12407941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The measurement of craniocervical posture: a simple method to evaluate head position.
    Cuccia AM; Carola C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 73(12):1732-6. PubMed ID: 19786307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares.
    Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in facial dimensions assessed from lateral and frontal photographs. Part I--Methodology.
    Bishara SE; Jorgensen GJ; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 7572850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Apr; 103(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 8480698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Head posture and cephalometric analyses: an integrated photographic/radiographic technique.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Germanò D; Dalloca LL; Miani A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 8074090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis.
    Lundström F; Lundström A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Mar; 101(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 1539551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are orthodontic landmarks and variables in digital cephalometric radiography taken in fixed and natural head positions reliable?
    Giannopoulou MA; Kondylidou-Sidira AC; Papadopoulos MA; Athanasiou AE
    Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 31495758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.
    Fortes HN; Guimarães TC; Belo IM; da Matta EN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 24945516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Holdaway measurement norms in Turkish adults.
    Sahin Sağlam AM
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):757-62. PubMed ID: 12553619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis.
    Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.