287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21543160)
1. European consumer response to packaging technologies for improved beef safety.
Van Wezemael L; Ueland Ø; Verbeke W
Meat Sci; 2011 Sep; 89(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 21543160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork.
Verbeke W; Pérez-Cueto FJ; Barcellos MD; Krystallis A; Grunert KG
Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 20374787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of technology information on consumer expectations and liking of beef.
Van Wezemael L; Ueland Ø; Rødbotten R; De Smet S; Scholderer J; Verbeke W
Meat Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):444-50. PubMed ID: 21981934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. European beef consumers' interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee Insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries.
Verbeke W; Van Wezemael L; de Barcellos MD; Kügler JO; Hocquette JF; Ueland Ø; Grunert KG
Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 19961887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of mustard flour to inactivate Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef under nitrogen flushed packaging.
Nadarajah D; Han JH; Holley RA
Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 99(3):257-67. PubMed ID: 15808360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scandinavian consumer preference for beef steaks packed with or without oxygen.
Aaslyng MD; Tørngren MA; Madsen NT
Meat Sci; 2010 Jul; 85(3):519-24. PubMed ID: 20416824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Traceability information carriers. The technology backgrounds and consumers' perceptions of the technological solutions.
Chrysochou P; Chryssochoidis G; Kehagia O
Appetite; 2009 Dec; 53(3):322-31. PubMed ID: 19631704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variables affecting the propensity to buy branded beef among groups of Australian beef buyers.
Morales LE; Griffith G; Wright V; Fleming E; Umberger W; Hoang N
Meat Sci; 2013 Jun; 94(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 23501257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consumers' quality perception of national branded, national store branded, and imported store branded beef.
Banović M; Grunert KG; Barreira MM; Fontes MA
Meat Sci; 2010 Jan; 84(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 20374754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consumer-perceived quality in 'traditional' food chains: the case of the Greek meat supply chain.
Krystallis A; Chryssochoidis G; Scholderer J
Appetite; 2007 Jan; 48(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 16965836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.
Beriain MJ; Sánchez M; Carr TR
J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3392-402. PubMed ID: 19542506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of packaging atmospheres on beef instrumental tenderness, fresh color stability, and internal cooked color.
Grobbel JP; Dikeman ME; Hunt MC; Milliken GA
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1191-9. PubMed ID: 18245502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consumer perception of the use of high-pressure processing and pulsed electric field technologies in food production.
Nielsen HB; Sonne AM; Grunert KG; Banati D; Pollák-Tóth A; Lakner Z; Olsen NV; Zontar TP; Peterman M
Appetite; 2009 Feb; 52(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 18845196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy, risk perceptions, and beef consumption: differences between Canada and Japan.
Muringai V; Goddard E
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2011; 74(2-4):167-90. PubMed ID: 21218346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fresh meat packaging: consumer acceptance of modified atmosphere packaging including carbon monoxide.
Grebitus C; Jensen HH; Roosen J; Sebranek JG
J Food Prot; 2013 Jan; 76(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 23317863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influences of packaging attributes on consumer purchase decisions for fresh produce.
Koutsimanis G; Getter K; Behe B; Harte J; Almenar E
Appetite; 2012 Oct; 59(2):270-80. PubMed ID: 22634201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beef consumer segment profiles based on information source usage in Poland.
Żakowska-Biemans S; Pieniak Z; Gutkowska K; Wierzbicki J; Cieszyńska K; Sajdakowska M; Kosicka-Gębska M
Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():105-113. PubMed ID: 27865127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of vacuum packaging and low-dose irradiation on the microbial, chemical and sensory characteristics of chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus).
Mbarki R; Ben Miloud N; Selmi S; Dhib S; Sadok S
Food Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 26(8):821-6. PubMed ID: 19835766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attitudes, perceptions, and trust. Insights from a consumer survey regarding genetically modified banana in Uganda.
Kikulwe EM; Wesseler J; Falck-Zepeda J
Appetite; 2011 Oct; 57(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 21704665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One technology does not fit all: profiling consumers of tender and tenderised beef steaks.
Almli VL; Van Wezemael L; Verbeke W; Ueland Ø
Meat Sci; 2013 Mar; 93(3):361-70. PubMed ID: 23273438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
