These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

885 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21543442)

  • 1. DREME: motif discovery in transcription factor ChIP-seq data.
    Bailey TL
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 27(12):1653-9. PubMed ID: 21543442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets.
    Machanick P; Bailey TL
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 27(12):1696-7. PubMed ID: 21486936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EXTREME: an online EM algorithm for motif discovery.
    Quang D; Xie X
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1667-73. PubMed ID: 24532725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Fast Cluster Motif Finding Algorithm for ChIP-Seq Data Sets.
    Zhang Y; Wang P
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():218068. PubMed ID: 26236718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-seq.
    Bailey TL; Machanick P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Sep; 40(17):e128. PubMed ID: 22610855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. STREME: accurate and versatile sequence motif discovery.
    Bailey TL
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Sep; 37(18):2834-2840. PubMed ID: 33760053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FisherMP: fully parallel algorithm for detecting combinatorial motifs from large ChIP-seq datasets.
    Zhang S; Liang Y; Wang X; Su Z; Chen Y
    DNA Res; 2019 Jun; 26(3):231-242. PubMed ID: 30957858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of position-specific priors in motif discovery using MEME.
    Bailey TL; Bodén M; Whitington T; Machanick P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Apr; 11():179. PubMed ID: 20380693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finding de novo methylated DNA motifs.
    Ngo V; Wang M; Wang W
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(18):3287-3293. PubMed ID: 30726880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discriminative motif analysis of high-throughput dataset.
    Yao Z; Macquarrie KL; Fong AP; Tapscott SJ; Ruzzo WL; Gentleman RC
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 30(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 24162561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inferring transcription factor complexes from ChIP-seq data.
    Whitington T; Frith MC; Johnson J; Bailey TL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Aug; 39(15):e98. PubMed ID: 21602262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SIOMICS: a novel approach for systematic identification of motifs in ChIP-seq data.
    Ding J; Hu H; Li X
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Mar; 42(5):e35. PubMed ID: 24322294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of context-dependent motifs by contrasting ChIP binding data.
    Mason MJ; Plath K; Zhou Q
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Nov; 26(22):2826-32. PubMed ID: 20870645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MOCCS: Clarifying DNA-binding motif ambiguity using ChIP-Seq data.
    Ozaki H; Iwasaki W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 63():62-72. PubMed ID: 26971251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic discovery and characterization of regulatory motifs in ENCODE TF binding experiments.
    Kheradpour P; Kellis M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Mar; 42(5):2976-87. PubMed ID: 24335146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Co-motif discovery identifies an Esrrb-Sox2-DNA ternary complex as a mediator of transcriptional differences between mouse embryonic and epiblast stem cells.
    Hutchins AP; Choo SH; Mistri TK; Rahmani M; Woon CT; Ng CK; Jauch R; Robson P
    Stem Cells; 2013 Feb; 31(2):269-81. PubMed ID: 23169531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of Co-Associated Transcription Factors via Ordered Adjacency Differences on Motif Distribution.
    Pan G; Tang J; Guo F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43597. PubMed ID: 28240320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. De novo motif identification improves the accuracy of predicting transcription factor binding sites in ChIP-Seq data analysis.
    Boeva V; Surdez D; Guillon N; Tirode F; Fejes AP; Delattre O; Barillot E
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Jun; 38(11):e126. PubMed ID: 20375099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. WSMD: weakly-supervised motif discovery in transcription factor ChIP-seq data.
    Zhang H; Zhu L; Huang DS
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3217. PubMed ID: 28607381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constrained transcription factor spacing is prevalent and important for transcriptional control of mouse blood cells.
    Ng FS; Schütte J; Ruau D; Diamanti E; Hannah R; Kinston SJ; Göttgens B
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Dec; 42(22):13513-24. PubMed ID: 25428352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.