These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

885 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21543442)

  • 21. Repulsive parallel MCMC algorithm for discovering diverse motifs from large sequence sets.
    Ikebata H; Yoshida R
    Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 31(10):1561-8. PubMed ID: 25583120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Non-targeted transcription factors motifs are a systemic component of ChIP-seq datasets.
    Worsley Hunt R; Wasserman WW
    Genome Biol; 2014 Jul; 15(7):412. PubMed ID: 25070602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A single ChIP-seq dataset is sufficient for comprehensive analysis of motifs co-occurrence with MCOT package.
    Levitsky V; Zemlyanskaya E; Oshchepkov D; Podkolodnaya O; Ignatieva E; Grosse I; Mironova V; Merkulova T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Dec; 47(21):e139. PubMed ID: 31750523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.
    Tahara S; Tsuchiya T; Matsumoto H; Ozaki H
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):597. PubMed ID: 37805453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching.
    Bailey TL; Boden M; Buske FA; Frith M; Grant CE; Clementi L; Ren J; Li WW; Noble WS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Jul; 37(Web Server issue):W202-8. PubMed ID: 19458158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differential motif enrichment analysis of paired ChIP-seq experiments.
    Lesluyes T; Johnson J; Machanick P; Bailey TL
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Sep; 15(1):752. PubMed ID: 25179504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. RSAT peak-motifs: motif analysis in full-size ChIP-seq datasets.
    Thomas-Chollier M; Herrmann C; Defrance M; Sand O; Thieffry D; van Helden J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Feb; 40(4):e31. PubMed ID: 22156162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Systematic discovery of cofactor motifs from ChIP-seq data by SIOMICS.
    Ding J; Dhillon V; Li X; Hu H
    Methods; 2015 Jun; 79-80():47-51. PubMed ID: 25171961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting TF-DNA Binding Motifs from ChIP-seq Datasets Using the Bag-Based Classifier Combined With a Multi-Fold Learning Scheme.
    Zhang Q; Wang D; Han K; Huang DS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2021; 18(5):1743-1751. PubMed ID: 32946398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. GSMC: Combining Parallel Gibbs Sampling with Maximal Cliques for Hunting DNA Motif.
    Pei C; Wang SL; Fang J; Zhang W
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1243-1253. PubMed ID: 29116820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. De novo prediction of cis-regulatory elements and modules through integrative analysis of a large number of ChIP datasets.
    Niu M; Tabari ES; Su Z
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15():1047. PubMed ID: 25442502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Discovery of cell-type specific DNA motif grammar in cis-regulatory elements using random Forest.
    Wang X; Lin P; Ho JWK
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Jan; 19(Suppl 1):929. PubMed ID: 29363433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Set cover-based methods for motif selection.
    Li Y; Liu Y; Juedes D; Drews F; Bunescu R; Welch L
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 36(4):1044-1051. PubMed ID: 31665223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved linking of motifs to their TFs using domain information.
    Baumgarten N; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31742324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. RSAT::Plants: Motif Discovery in ChIP-Seq Peaks of Plant Genomes.
    Castro-Mondragon JA; Rioualen C; Contreras-Moreira B; van Helden J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1482():297-322. PubMed ID: 27557775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistics of protein-DNA binding and the total number of binding sites for a transcription factor in the mammalian genome.
    Kuznetsov VA; Singh O; Jenjaroenpun P
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Feb; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 20158869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the detection and refinement of transcription factor binding sites using ChIP-Seq data.
    Hu M; Yu J; Taylor JM; Chinnaiyan AM; Qin ZS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Apr; 38(7):2154-67. PubMed ID: 20056654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. SeqGL Identifies Context-Dependent Binding Signals in Genome-Wide Regulatory Element Maps.
    Setty M; Leslie CS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 May; 11(5):e1004271. PubMed ID: 26016777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A highly efficient and effective motif discovery method for ChIP-seq/ChIP-chip data using positional information.
    Ma X; Kulkarni A; Zhang Z; Xuan Z; Serfling R; Zhang MQ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Apr; 40(7):e50. PubMed ID: 22228832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ProSampler: an ultrafast and accurate motif finder in large ChIP-seq datasets for combinatory motif discovery.
    Li Y; Ni P; Zhang S; Li G; Su Z
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 35(22):4632-4639. PubMed ID: 31070745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.