247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21543788)
1. Suppression of cautery-induced electromagnetic interference of cardiac implantable electrical devices by closely spaced bipolar sensing.
Suresh M; Benditt DG; Gold B; Joshi GP; Lurie KG
Anesth Analg; 2011 Jun; 112(6):1358-61. PubMed ID: 21543788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of surgical and endoscopic electrocautery on modern-day permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems.
Cheng A; Nazarian S; Spragg DD; Bilchick K; Tandri H; Mark L; Halperin H; Calkins H; Berger RD; Henrikson CA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 18307631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) and arrhythmic events in ICD patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures.
Guertin D; Faheem O; Ling T; Pelletier G; McComas D; Yarlagadda RK; Clyne C; Kluger J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jun; 30(6):734-9. PubMed ID: 17547605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of intraoperative electrosurgery-induced implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) detection.
Friedman H; Higgins JV; Ryan JD; Konecny T; Asirvatham SJ; Cha YM
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Jan; 48(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 27665098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharges unrelated to supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.
Occhetta E; Bortnik M; Magnani A; Francalacci G; Marino P
Europace; 2006 Oct; 8(10):863-9. PubMed ID: 16916859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrocautery-induced ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation during device implantation and explantation.
Lo R; Mitrache A; Quan W; Cohen TJ
J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 19(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 17297178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electromagnetic interference with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators from low-frequency electromagnetic fields in vivo.
Tiikkaja M; Aro AL; Alanko T; Lindholm H; Sistonen H; Hartikainen JE; Toivonen L; Juutilainen J; Hietanen M
Europace; 2013 Mar; 15(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 23125355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electromagnetic interference of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator and HeartWare left ventricular assist device.
Labedi MR; Alharethi R; Kfoury AG; Budge D; Bruce R; Rasmusson B; Bunch TJ
ASAIO J; 2013; 59(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 23438775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety of repetitive nerve stimulation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Cronin EM; Gray J; Abi-Saleh B; Wilkoff BL; Levin KH
Muscle Nerve; 2013 Jun; 47(6):840-4. PubMed ID: 23605784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implantable rhythm devices and electromagnetic interference: myth or reality?
Dyrda K; Khairy P
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2008 Jul; 6(6):823-32. PubMed ID: 18570620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. True bipolar defibrillator leads have increased sensing latency and threshold compared with the integrated bipolar configuration.
Frain BH; Ellison KE; Michaud GF; Koo CH; Buxton AE; Kirk MM
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):192-5. PubMed ID: 17239139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An unusual source of electromagnetic interference: a device-device interaction.
Kowalski M; Shepard RK; Kalahasty G; Wood MA; Ellenbogen KA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 Aug; 33(8):994-8. PubMed ID: 20408965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. True bipolar and integrated bipolar sensing and detection by implantable defibrillators.
Verga TA; Gillberg JM; Greenberg RM; Deger FT
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2011 Nov; 34(11):1561-8. PubMed ID: 21797907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of ventricular fibrillation in implantable defibrillators with automatic gain control amplifiers: effects of programming sensitivity.
Schulte B; Sperzel J; Schwarz T; Pitschner HF; Strupp G; Neuzner J
Europace; 2000 Apr; 2(2):160-2. PubMed ID: 11225942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: present but rare.
von Olshausen G; Rondak IC; Lennerz C; Semmler V; Grebmer C; Reents T; Ammar-Busch S; Buiatti A; Bourier F; Deisenhofer I; Kolb C
Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 105(8):657-665. PubMed ID: 26825328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electromagnetic interference from welding and motors on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators as tested in the electrically hostile work site.
Fetter JG; Benditt DG; Stanton MS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Aug; 28(2):423-7. PubMed ID: 8800120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction ovens and electromagnetic interference: what is the risk for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Binggeli C; Rickli H; Ammann P; Brunckhorst C; Hufschmid U; Luechinger R; Duru F
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Apr; 16(4):399-401. PubMed ID: 15828884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnets and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: what's the problem?
Rodriguez-Blanco YF; Souki F; Tamayo E; Candiotti K
Ann Card Anaesth; 2013; 16(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 23287088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electromagnetic interference with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators at power frequency: an in vivo study.
Napp A; Joosten S; Stunder D; Knackstedt C; Zink M; Bellmann B; Marx N; Schauerte P; Silny J
Circulation; 2014 Jan; 129(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 24163067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In-vivo testing of digital cellular telephones in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
Chiladakis JA; Davlouros P; Agelopoulos G; Manolis AS
Eur Heart J; 2001 Aug; 22(15):1337-42. PubMed ID: 11465966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
