These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21544847)

  • 1. Analysis of spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports using supplementary information.
    Ghosh P; Dewanji A
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(16):2040-55. PubMed ID: 21544847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EU-ADR healthcare database network vs. spontaneous reporting system database: preliminary comparison of signal detection.
    Trifirò G; Patadia V; Schuemie MJ; Coloma PM; Gini R; Herings R; Hippisley-Cox J; Mazzaglia G; Giaquinto C; Scotti L; Pedersen L; Avillach P; Sturkenboom MC; van der Lei J; Eu-Adr Group
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 166():25-30. PubMed ID: 21685607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adverse drug event surveillance and drug withdrawals in the United States, 1969-2002: the importance of reporting suspected reactions.
    Wysowski DK; Swartz L
    Arch Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 165(12):1363-9. PubMed ID: 15983284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of drug safety information using large-scale adverse drug reactions database].
    Morikawa K
    Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 2011; (129):1-26. PubMed ID: 22259840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reports of hyperkalemia after publication of RALES--a pharmacovigilance study.
    Hauben M; Reich L; Gerrits CM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2006 Nov; 15(11):775-83. PubMed ID: 16804951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing reporting rates of adverse events between drugs with adjustment for year of marketing and secular trends in total reporting.
    Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):95-114. PubMed ID: 7613562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How do pharmaceutical companies handle consumer adverse drug reaction reports? An overview based on a survey of French drug safety managers and officers.
    Fleuranceau-Morel P
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002; 11(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 11998550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the assessment of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting systems: the influence of under-reporting on odds ratios.
    van der Heijden PG; van Puijenbroek EP; van Buuren S; van der Hofstede JW
    Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(14):2027-44. PubMed ID: 12111885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Under-reporting of serious adverse drug reactions in Sweden.
    Bäckström M; Mjörndal T; Dahlqvist R
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2004 Jul; 13(7):483-7. PubMed ID: 15269932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Signals of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy for immunosuppressants: a disproportionality analysis of spontaneous reports within the US Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS).
    Schmedt N; Andersohn F; Garbe E
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 Nov; 21(11):1216-20. PubMed ID: 22821419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diplopia and fluoroquinolones.
    Fraunfelder FW; Fraunfelder FT
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Sep; 116(9):1814-7. PubMed ID: 19643481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diplopia, blepharoptosis, and ophthalmoplegia and 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor use.
    Fraunfelder FW; Richards AB
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2282-5. PubMed ID: 18930555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of databases in drug postmarketing surveillance.
    Rodriguez EM; Staffa JA; Graham DJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2001; 10(5):407-10. PubMed ID: 11802586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative signal detection using spontaneous ADR reporting.
    Bate A; Evans SJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Jun; 18(6):427-36. PubMed ID: 19358225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Likelihood ratio test-based method for signal detection in drug classes using FDA's AERS database.
    Huang L; Zalkikar J; Tiwari RC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(1):178-200. PubMed ID: 23331230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A potential competition bias in the detection of safety signals from spontaneous reporting databases.
    Pariente A; Didailler M; Avillach P; Miremont-Salamé G; Fourrier-Reglat A; Haramburu F; Moore N
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2010 Nov; 19(11):1166-71. PubMed ID: 20848561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions.
    van Puijenbroek EP; Bate A; Leufkens HG; Lindquist M; Orre R; Egberts AC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002; 11(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 11998548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing the spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions--the experience of the Slovak Republic.
    Tisonová J; Szalayová A; Kriska M; Gibala P; Foltán V
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2004 May; 13(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 15133786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Making the most of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting.
    Waller PC
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2006 Mar; 98(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 16611209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Topical bovine thrombin: a 21-year review of topical bovine thrombin spontaneous case safety reports submitted to FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System.
    Clark JA; Humphries JE; Crean S; Reynolds MW
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2010 Feb; 19(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 20014051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.