These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21544847)

  • 21. Importance and challenges of studying marketed drugs: what is a phase IV study? Common clinical research designs, registries, and self-reporting systems.
    Glasser SP; Salas M; Delzell E
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Sep; 47(9):1074-86. PubMed ID: 17766697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mining pharmacovigilance data using Bayesian logistic regression with James-Stein type shrinkage estimation.
    An L; Fung KY; Krewski D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Sep; 20(5):998-1012. PubMed ID: 20721787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions by nurses.
    Bäckström M; Mjörndal T; Dahlqvist R
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002 Dec; 11(8):647-50. PubMed ID: 12512239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Methods for drug safety signal detection in longitudinal observational databases: LGPS and LEOPARD.
    Schuemie MJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Mar; 20(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 20945505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction of drug-related cardiac adverse effects in humans--A: creation of a database of effects and identification of factors affecting their occurrence.
    Matthews EJ; Frid AA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Apr; 56(3):247-75. PubMed ID: 19932726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A computerized system for signal detection in spontaneous reporting system of Shanghai China.
    Ye X; Fu Z; Wang H; Du W; Wang R; Sun Y; Gao Q; He J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Feb; 18(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 19115240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Antipsychotics, glycemic disorders, and life-threatening diabetic events: a Bayesian data-mining analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (1968-2004).
    DuMouchel W; Fram D; Yang X; Mahmoud RA; Grogg AL; Engelhart L; Ramaswamy K
    Ann Clin Psychiatry; 2008; 20(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 18297583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nurses are increasingly involved in pharmacovigilance in Sweden.
    Ulfvarson J; Mejyr S; Bergman U
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 May; 16(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 17072915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adverse drug reactions related to amoxicillin alone and in association with clavulanic acid: data from spontaneous reporting in Italy.
    Salvo F; Polimeni G; Moretti U; Conforti A; Leone R; Leoni O; Motola D; Dusi G; Caputi AP
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2007 Jul; 60(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 17449881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A pilot study to build a database on seven anti-hypertensive drugs.
    Fujita T; Miura Y; Mayama T
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Jan; 14(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 15534857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characteristics and quality of adverse drug reaction reports by pharmacists in Norway.
    Gedde-Dahl A; Harg P; Stenberg-Nilsen H; Buajordet M; Granas AG; Horn AM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 Sep; 16(9):999-1005. PubMed ID: 17457794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Applying quantitative methods for detecting new drug safety signals in pharmacovigilance national database.
    Shalviri G; Mohammad K; Majdzadeh R; Gholami K
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1136-40. PubMed ID: 17705214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quality check of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting forms of different countries.
    Bandekar MS; Anwikar SR; Kshirsagar NA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2010 Nov; 19(11):1181-5. PubMed ID: 20845409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reporting of adverse drug reactions: predictors of under-reporting in Malaysia.
    Aziz Z; Siang TC; Badarudin NS
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 Feb; 16(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 16947117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection on adverse drug reaction spontaneous reporting database of Guangdong province in China.
    Li C; Xia J; Deng J; Jiang J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Jun; 17(6):593-600. PubMed ID: 18432629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Spontaneous reporting system for the assessment of new, unknown and rare undesirable effects of drugs].
    Hartmann K; Kuhn M; Gartmann J
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1992 Sep; 122(38):1409-13. PubMed ID: 1411399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A statistical methodology for drug-drug interaction surveillance.
    Norén GN; Sundberg R; Bate A; Edwards IR
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(16):3057-70. PubMed ID: 18344185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical pharmacy services, pharmacy staffing, and adverse drug reactions in United States hospitals.
    Bond CA; Raehl CL
    Pharmacotherapy; 2006 Jun; 26(6):735-47. PubMed ID: 16716127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing data mining methods on the VAERS database.
    Banks D; Woo EJ; Burwen DR; Perucci P; Braun MM; Ball R
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Sep; 14(9):601-9. PubMed ID: 15954077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of adverse drug reactions using drug and drug target interactions and graph-based methods.
    Lin SF; Xiao KT; Huang YT; Chiu CC; Soo VW
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):161-6. PubMed ID: 19962282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.