160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21546227)
1. [Presidential letter].
Schreiber L
Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 21546227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The special role of the physician in relation to the expert witness].
Kaiser V
Aktuelle Traumatol; 1990 Feb; 20(1):49. PubMed ID: 1969696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Development of expert assessment in the malpractice lawsuit from the viewpoint of the judge].
Franzki H
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):652-6; discussion 656-7. PubMed ID: 9064942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Significance of guidelines by specialty societies as clinical pathway in medicine. Malpractice liability of an indication (BGB section 823)].
Wienke A
HNO; 2003 Oct; 51(10):836-88. PubMed ID: 14971426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Conflicting expert opinions from the medical viewpoint].
Specht G
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):640-1. PubMed ID: 9064939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Amended judgment of malpractice due to delayed expert testimony. Decision by the German Federal Court 22 November 2005].
Rieger HJ
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Jun; 131(23):1339-40. PubMed ID: 16761205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Discussing errors with patients. Don't prime the malpractice trap!].
Thomas A
MMW Fortschr Med; 2004 Dec; 146(49):53-4. PubMed ID: 15646720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Intention of the patient certain the surgeons election].
Wienke A
Laryngorhinootologie; 2009 Dec; 88(12):797. PubMed ID: 20027536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Attempted retraction of suspected medical diagnosis? Ruling of the German federal court 23 February 1999].
Rieger HJ
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1999 Jul; 124(27):848-9. PubMed ID: 10432946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Jural--decisions and background].
Thiede A; Zimmermann HJ
Zentralbl Chir; 2004 Apr; 129(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 15190870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Limits of patient responsibility for cooperation with medical experts].
Schreiber HL
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):642-6; discussion 647. PubMed ID: 9064940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical consultation and expert testimony in claims litigation. Professional and ethical guidelines.
Roberts HJ
J Insur Med; 1991; 23(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 10148473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Medical malpractice in surgery II: Ways of risk management].
Hansis ML
Zentralbl Chir; 2003 Apr; 128(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 12700997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The new Second Opinion Procedure].
Wienke A
Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Feb; 96(2):118-119. PubMed ID: 28292000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Medical expert assessment in the Anglo-American lawsuit].
Deutsch E
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):648-52. PubMed ID: 9064941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expert medical testimony: responsibilities of medical societies.
McAbee GN
Neurology; 2005 Jul; 65(2):337; author reply 337. PubMed ID: 16043821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The physician as a legal expert witness].
Hiersche HD; Hiersche F
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 Aug; 49(8):691-3. PubMed ID: 2792703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Litigation, legislation, and ethics. When two heads are not better than one.
Jerrold L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):133-5. PubMed ID: 19121513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Not Available].
Wienke A
Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Oct; 96(10):716-717. PubMed ID: 29017232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. American Academy of Neurology qualifications and guidelines for the physician expert witness.
Williams MA; Mackin GA; Beresford HR; Gordon J; Jacobson PL; McQuillen MP; Reimschisel TE; Taylor RM; Bernat JL; Rizzo M; Snyder RD; Sagsveen MG; Amery M; Brannon WL;
Neurology; 2006 Jan; 66(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 16401838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
