267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21546450)
1. Inter-scan variability of coronary artery calcium scoring assessed on 64-multidetector computed tomography vs. dual-source computed tomography: a head-to-head comparison.
Ghadri JR; Goetti R; Fiechter M; Pazhenkottil AP; Küest SM; Nkoulou RN; Windler C; Buechel RR; Herzog BA; Gaemperli O; Templin C; Kaufmann PA
Eur Heart J; 2011 Aug; 32(15):1865-74. PubMed ID: 21546450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.
Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of coronary artery calcium scores between electron beam computed tomography and 64-multidetector computed tomographic scanner.
Mao SS; Pal RS; McKay CR; Gao YG; Gopal A; Ahmadi N; Child J; Carson S; Takasu J; Sarlak B; Bechmann D; Budoff MJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 19346841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interplatform reproducibility of CT coronary calcium scoring software.
Weininger M; Ritz KS; Schoepf UJ; Flohr TG; Vliegenthart R; Costello P; Hahn D; Beissert M
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 22771886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coronary artery calcium quantification on first, second and third generation dual source CT: A comparison study.
Vonder M; Pelgrim GJ; Huijsse SEM; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; van Ooijen PMA; Oudkerk M; Henzler T; Vliegenthart R
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017 Nov; 11(6):444-448. PubMed ID: 28943454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of varying slice thickness on coronary calcium scoring with multislice computed tomography in vitro and in vivo.
Mühlenbruch G; Thomas C; Wildberger JE; Koos R; Das M; Hohl C; Katoh M; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
Invest Radiol; 2005 Nov; 40(11):695-9. PubMed ID: 16230901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence for lower variability of coronary artery calcium mineral mass measurements by multi-detector computed tomography in a community-based cohort--consequences for progression studies.
Hoffmann U; Siebert U; Bull-Stewart A; Achenbach S; Ferencik M; Moselewski F; Brady TJ; Massaro JM; O'Donnell CJ
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 16434160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT.
Obmann VC; Klink T; Heverhagen JT; Stork A; Laqmani A; Adam G; Begemann PG
Rofo; 2015 May; 187(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 25962672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium scoring and radiation Dose on 64- and 16-slice computed tomography by prospective electrocardiographically-triggered axial and retrospective electrocardiographically-gated spiral computed tomography: a phantom study.
Horiguchi J; Kiguchi M; Fujioka C; Arie R; Shen Y; Sunasaka K; Kitagawa T; Yamamoto H; Ito K
Acad Radiol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):958-65. PubMed ID: 18620116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronary artery calcium scoring on low-dose prospective electrocardiographically-triggered 64-slice CT.
Horiguchi J; Matsuura N; Yamamoto H; Kiguchi M; Fujioka C; Kitagawa T; Kohno N; Ito K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 19124104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of coronary artery calcium scoring on virtual unenhanced images derived from single-source fast kVp-switching dual-energy coronary CT angiography.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Okamura T; Yamada M; Tanami Y; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(5):391-400. PubMed ID: 25301045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of coronary calcifications with 64-slice CT - variability of the scores and the influence of the reconstruction interval].
Weininger M; Ritter CO; Beer M; Hahn D; Beissert M
Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):938-44. PubMed ID: 17705116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The interscan variation of CT coronary artery calcification score: analysis of the Calcium Acetate Renagel Comparison (CARE)-2 study.
Budoff MJ; Kessler P; Gao YL; Qunibi W; Moustafa M; Mao SS
Acad Radiol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 18078907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coronary artery calcification scoring in low-dose ungated CT screening for lung cancer: interscan agreement.
Jacobs PC; Isgum I; Gondrie MJ; Mali WP; van Ginneken B; Prokop M; van der Graaf Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1244-9. PubMed ID: 20410410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring coronary calcium on CT images adjusted for attenuation differences.
Nelson JC; Kronmal RA; Carr JJ; McNitt-Gray MF; Wong ND; Loria CM; Goldin JG; Williams OD; Detrano R
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 15858082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of cardiovascular risk on routine chest CT: Ordinal coronary artery calcium scoring as an accurate predictor of Agatston score ranges.
Azour L; Kadoch MA; Ward TJ; Eber CD; Jacobi AH
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 27743881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of coronary artery calcium measurements using 0.8-mm-thickness 256-slice coronary CT.
Ann SH; Kim JH; Ha ND; Choi SH; Garg S; Singh GB; Shin ES
Jpn J Radiol; 2014 Dec; 32(12):677-84. PubMed ID: 25277791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of three different scoring systems for measurement of coronary calcium.
Yamamoto H; Budoff MJ; Lu B; Takasu J; Oudiz RJ; Mao S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2002 Oct; 18(5):391-7. PubMed ID: 12194680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary artery calcium scoring on different 64-detector scanners using a low-tube voltage (80 kVp).
Fujioka C; Funama Y; Kiguchi M; Ishifuro M; Kihara Y; Nagata Y; Awai K
Acad Radiol; 2012 Nov; 19(11):1402-7. PubMed ID: 22925933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calcium scoring using 64-slice MDCT, dual source CT and EBT: a comparative phantom study.
Groen JM; Greuter MJ; Vliegenthart R; Suess C; Schmidt B; Zijlstra F; Oudkerk M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jun; 24(5):547-56. PubMed ID: 18038190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
