These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21547771)

  • 1. An exploratory mindset reduces preference for prototypes and increases preference for novel exemplars.
    Hansen J; Topolinski S
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Jun; 25(4):709-16. PubMed ID: 21547771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preparing for novel versus familiar events: shifts in global and local processing.
    Förster J; Liberman N; Shapira O
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Aug; 138(3):383-99. PubMed ID: 19653797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition memory is modulated by visual similarity.
    Yago E; Ishai A
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):807-17. PubMed ID: 16459105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transition from novelty to familiarity preference depending on recognition performance by 4-yr.-olds.
    Uehara I
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):837-48. PubMed ID: 11191399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind.
    Winkielman P; Halberstadt J; Fazendeiro T; Catty S
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):799-806. PubMed ID: 16984298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of size changes on haptic object recognition.
    Craddock M; Lawson R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):910-23. PubMed ID: 19429968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Categorization reduces the effect of context on hedonic preference.
    Zellner DA; Mattingly MC; Parker S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1228-32. PubMed ID: 19633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced context-dependency of object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions.
    O'Brien N; Lehmann H; Lecluse V; Mumby DG
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 170(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 16580742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic norm-based encoding for unfamiliar shapes in human visual cortex.
    Panis S; Wagemans J; Op de Beeck HP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jul; 23(7):1829-43. PubMed ID: 20807059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes.
    Bonanno GA; Stillings NA
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(3):403-15. PubMed ID: 3799851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of adults' affective expression and direction of visual gaze on 12-month-olds' visual preferences for an object following a 5-minute, 1-day, or 1-month delay.
    Flom R; Johnson S
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Mar; 29(Pt 1):64-85. PubMed ID: 21288254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Context specificity of implicit preferences: the case of human preference for red.
    Maier MA; Barchfeld P; Elliot AJ; Pekrun R
    Emotion; 2009 Oct; 9(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 19803595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization.
    Palmeri TJ; Nosofsky RM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):197-235. PubMed ID: 11216316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia).
    Makino H; Jitsumori M
    J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 17324072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Familiarity and preference for pitch probability profiles.
    Cui AX; Collett MJ; Troje NF; Cuddy LL
    Cogn Process; 2015 May; 16(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 25838257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective visual attention and motivation: the consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task.
    Raymond JE; O'Brien JL
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Aug; 20(8):981-8. PubMed ID: 19549080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eliminating the mere exposure effect through changes in context between exposure and test.
    de Zilva D; Mitchell CJ; Newell BR
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(8):1345-58. PubMed ID: 23506223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ERP study on self-relevant object recognition.
    Miyakoshi M; Nomura M; Ohira H
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Mar; 63(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 17223240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Up-regulation of exploratory tendencies does not enhance general learning abilities in juvenile or young-adult outbred mice.
    Light KR; Kolata S; Hale G; Grossman H; Matzel LD
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2008 Sep; 90(2):317-29. PubMed ID: 18555705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preference for negative emotions.
    Västfjäll D; Gärling T
    Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):326-9. PubMed ID: 16768564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.