These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21547790)

  • 1. The effects of age, viewing distance, display type, font type, colour contrast and number of syllables on the legibility of Korean characters.
    Kong YK; Lee I; Jung MC; Song YW
    Ergonomics; 2011 May; 54(5):453-65. PubMed ID: 21547790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Writing and reading training effects on font type and size preferences by students with low vision.
    Atasavun Uysal S; Düger T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Jun; 114(3):837-46. PubMed ID: 22913024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A comparison of Chinese reading parameters among rapid serial visual presentation, full screen and printed displays].
    Wang CX; Lü F; Xu D; Chen J; Xie RZ; Zhu L; Qu J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 43(8):704-8. PubMed ID: 18001567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of font and line width on reading speed in people with mild to moderate vision loss.
    Rubin GS; Feely M; Perera S; Ekstrom K; Williamson E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Nov; 26(6):545-54. PubMed ID: 17040418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Text legibility and the letter superiority effect.
    Sheedy JE; Subbaram MV; Zimmerman AB; Hayes JR
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):797-815. PubMed ID: 16553067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applying image descriptors to the assessment of legibility in Chinese characters.
    Chi CF; Cai D; You M
    Ergonomics; 2003 Jun; 46(8):825-41. PubMed ID: 12745981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Font size and viewing distance of handheld smart phones.
    Bababekova Y; Rosenfield M; Hue JE; Huang RR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 88(7):795-7. PubMed ID: 21499163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic paper display preferred viewing distance and character size for different age groups.
    Wu HC
    Ergonomics; 2011 Sep; 54(9):806-14. PubMed ID: 21943118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision.
    Mansfield JS; Legge GE; Bane MC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jul; 37(8):1492-501. PubMed ID: 8675391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of English letters' legibility using image descriptors.
    Cai D; Chi CF; You M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):618-28. PubMed ID: 19093622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visually impaired observers require a larger window than normally sighted observers to read from a scroll display.
    Fine EM; Peli E
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Jul; 67(7):390-6. PubMed ID: 8888864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability of characters on mobile phone liquid crystal displays.
    Hasegawa S; Fujikake K; Omori M; Miyao M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2008; 14(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 18954539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effects of Letter Design Features and Aging on Legibility.
    Ohyama J; Sagawa K
    Perception; 2016 Jun; 45(6):642-656. PubMed ID: 26822416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection of the optimum font type and size interface for on screen continuous reading by young adults: an ergonomic approach.
    Banerjee J; Bhattacharyya M
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2011 Dec; 40(1-2):47-62. PubMed ID: 25665207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Letter processing and font information during reading: beyond distinctiveness, where vision meets design.
    Sanocki T; Dyson MC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):132-45. PubMed ID: 22012239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of luminance contrast, colour combinations, font, and search time on brand icon legibility.
    Ko YH
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():33-40. PubMed ID: 28802453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Serifs and font legibility.
    Arditi A; Cho J
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(23):2926-33. PubMed ID: 16099015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehension of informed consent information by young-old through old-old volunteers.
    Taub HA; Baker MT; Kline GE; Sturr JF
    Exp Aging Res; 1987; 13(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 3505870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the optimised font size and viewing time of online learning in young children: a multicentre cross-sectional study.
    Ma LU; Yu X; Gong L; Wei L; Peng Z; Wang K; Li Y; Zhou J; Zhao M
    BMJ Paediatr Open; 2023 Apr; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 37185652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of display angles on the legibility of Sans-Serif 5 × 5 capitalized letters.
    Cai H; Li L
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Jul; 45(4):865-77. PubMed ID: 24290564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.