These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21549333)

  • 1. Attention and gaze shifting in dual-task and go/no-go performance with vocal responding.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 21549333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Head movements modulate visual responsiveness in the absence of gaze shifts.
    Cicchini GM; Valsecchi M; De'Sperati C
    Neuroreport; 2008 May; 19(8):831-4. PubMed ID: 18463496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Properties of human eye-head gaze shifts in an anti-gaze shift task.
    Chapman BB; Corneil BD
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):538-48. PubMed ID: 18166209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Error-related negativity in a visual go/no-go task: children vs. adults.
    Kim EY; Iwaki N; Imashioya H; Uno H; Fujita T
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2007; 31(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 17488215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pictorial gaze cues do not enhance long-tailed macaques' performance on a computerised object-location task.
    Vick SJ; Toxopeus I; Anderson JR
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 16962253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Slow motor responses to visual stimuli of low salience in autism.
    Todd J; Mills C; Wilson AD; Plumb MS; Mon-Williams MA
    J Mot Behav; 2009 Oct; 41(5):419-26. PubMed ID: 19460749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constraints in task-set control: modality dominance patterns among effector systems.
    Huestegge L; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):633-7. PubMed ID: 23025562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related differences in performance and stimulus processing in dual task situation.
    Hahn M; Wild-Wall N; Falkenstein M
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1414():66-76. PubMed ID: 21871612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ERP investigation of task switching using a flanker paradigm.
    Umebayashi K; Okita T
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1346():165-73. PubMed ID: 20573600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mixed pro and antisaccade performance in children and adults.
    Irving EL; Tajik-Parvinchi DJ; Lillakas L; González EG; Steinbach MJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():67-74. PubMed ID: 19103183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elimination of the enhanced Simon effect for older adults in a three-choice situation: ageing and the Simon effect in a go/no-go Simon task.
    Kubo-Kawai N; Kawai N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):452-64. PubMed ID: 19575334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortical response to task-relevant stimuli presented outside the primary focus of attention.
    Houtkamp R; Braun J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Sep; 22(9):1980-92. PubMed ID: 19702464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions.
    Aarts E; Roelofs A; van Turennout M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2089-99. PubMed ID: 19467359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do age-related changes contribute to the flanker effect?
    Hsieh S; Liang YC; Tsai YC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 May; 123(5):960-72. PubMed ID: 21978651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention allocation in the dual-task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses.
    Karatekin C; Couperus JW; Marcus DJ
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 15032983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eyes always attract attention but gaze orienting is task-dependent: evidence from eye movement monitoring.
    Itier RJ; Villate C; Ryan JD
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):1019-28. PubMed ID: 17064739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.