These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21550518)

  • 1. Radical renal surgery (laparoscopic and open) in octogenarians.
    Vasdev N; Hussein HK; Davidson A; Wood H; O'Riordan A; Soomro NA
    Surgeon; 2011 Jun; 9(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 21550518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in obese patients: outcomes and technical considerations.
    Fugita OE; Chan DY; Roberts WW; Kavoussi LR; Jarrett TW
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):247-52; discussion 252. PubMed ID: 14972463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complications of contemporary radical nephrectomy: comparison of open vs. laparoscopic approach.
    Shuford MD; McDougall EM; Chang SS; LaFleur BJ; Smith JA; Cookson MS
    Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 15082009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
    Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in patients with dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease.
    Yamashita K; Ito F; Nakazawa H
    Ther Apher Dial; 2012 Jun; 16(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 22607569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.
    Dunn MD; Portis AJ; Shalhav AL; Elbahnasy AM; Heidorn C; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2000 Oct; 164(4):1153-9. PubMed ID: 10992356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Higher perioperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing nephrectomy for non-metastatic kidney cancer: a population-based analysis.
    Schmitges J; Trinh QD; Sun M; Hansen J; Bianchi M; Jeldres C; Perrotte P; Dahlem R; Shariat SF; Chun FK; Montorsi F; Menon M; Fisch M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6 Pt B):E183-90. PubMed ID: 22321256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses.
    O'Malley RL; Berger AD; Kanofsky JA; Phillips CK; Stifelman M; Taneja SS
    BJU Int; 2007 Feb; 99(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 17092288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of hand assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for suspected renal cell carcinoma.
    Nelson CP; Wolf JS
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1989-94. PubMed ID: 11956425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term follow-up of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for organ-confined renal cell carcinoma.
    Chung SD; Huang KH; Lai MK; Huang CY; Pu YS; Yu HJ; Chueh SC
    Urology; 2007 Apr; 69(4):652-5. PubMed ID: 17445645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The laparoscopic approach to renal tumors outcome of 121 laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy procedures].
    Nadu A; Laufer M; Winkler H; Kleinmann N; Ramon J
    Harefuah; 2005 Sep; 144(9):609-12, 679. PubMed ID: 16218528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison.
    Hemal AK; Kumar A; Kumar R; Wadhwa P; Seth A; Gupta NP
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):862-6. PubMed ID: 17296361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship of postoperative complications with in-hospital outcomes and costs after renal surgery for kidney cancer.
    Kim SP; Leibovich BC; Shah ND; Weight CJ; Borah BJ; Han LC; Boorjian SA; Thompson RH
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):580-8. PubMed ID: 22564425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes.
    Pyo P; Chen A; Grasso M
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1279-83. PubMed ID: 18707736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal carcinoma using a new abdominal wall sealing device.
    Tanaka M; Tokuda N; Koga H; Yokomizo A; Sakamoto N; Naito S
    J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):314-8. PubMed ID: 10893573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.
    Tanaka M; Tokuda N; Naito S
    Aktuelle Urol; 2003 Jul; 34(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 14566682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic versus open cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Rabets JC; Kaouk J; Fergany A; Finelli A; Gill IS; Novick AC
    Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):930-4. PubMed ID: 15533480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease: an analysis and comparison of perioperative outcome.
    Bird VG; Shields JM; Aziz M; De Los Santos R; Ayyathurai R; Ciancio G
    Urology; 2010 Jun; 75(6):1335-42. PubMed ID: 20035985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of pathological T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma: a 5-year survival rate.
    Permpongkosol S; Bagga HS; Romero FR; Sroka M; Jarrett TW; Kavoussi LR
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):1984-8; discussion 1988-9. PubMed ID: 17070227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External validation of a model for tailoring the operative approach to minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
    Vricella GJ; Murray S; Boncher NA; Madi R
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1806-10. PubMed ID: 21040363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.