247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21550866)
1. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months.
Eder M; v Waldenfels F; Sichtermann M; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Biemer E; Kovacs L
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1152-60. PubMed ID: 21550866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.
Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3-D analysis of breast morphology changes after inverted T-scar and vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty over 12 months.
Eder M; Klöppel M; Müller D; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Kovacs L
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):776-86. PubMed ID: 23478011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defining pseudoptosis (bottoming out) 3 years after short-scar medial pedicle breast reduction.
Quan M; Fadl A; Small K; Tepper O; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp N
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Jun; 35(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 21082180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re-defining pseudoptosis from a 3D perspective after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty.
Small KH; Tepper OM; Unger JG; Kumar N; Feldman DL; Choi M; Karp NS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Feb; 63(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 19091641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective study of breast dynamic morphological changes after dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty with 3D scanning technique.
Ji K; Luan J; Liu C; Mu D; Mu L; Xin M; Sun J; Yin S; Chen L
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e93010. PubMed ID: 24671190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-lasting evolution of ptosis control after reduction mammaplasty using the hammock technique.
Pérez-Macías JM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 17484060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defining the kinetics of breast pseudoptosis after reduction mammaplasty.
Choi M; Unger J; Small K; Tepper O; Kumar N; Feldman D; Karp N
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):518-22. PubMed ID: 19387153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.
Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective breast symmetry evaluation using 3-D surface imaging.
Eder M; Waldenfels FV; Swobodnik A; Klöppel M; Pape AK; Schuster T; Raith S; Kitzler E; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Kovacs L
Breast; 2012 Apr; 21(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 21849246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional laser imaging as a valuable tool for specifying changes in breast shape after augmentation mammaplasty.
Esme DL; Bucksch A; Beekman WH
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 18982384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of breast resection weight in reduction mammaplasty based on 3-dimensional surface imaging.
Eder M; Grabhorn A; Waldenfels Fv; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Kovacs L
Surg Innov; 2013 Aug; 20(4):356-64. PubMed ID: 22983806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between scoliosis and breast asymmetries in women undergoing augmentation mammaplasty.
Tsai FC; Hsieh MS; Liao CK; Wu ST
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 34(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 20383498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation.
Pitanguy I; Vaena M; Radwanski HN; Nunes D; Vargas AF
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 17484059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Areola-nipple perception threshold to faradic electricity: a new measure of sensibility of the breasts.
Prado A; Andrades P; Benitez S; Parada F
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 Sep; 32(5):748-52. PubMed ID: 18443851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Constitutional asymmetries in aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, postoperative satisfaction and surgical options].
Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Ihrai T; Lebreton E
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2009 Aug; 54(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 19342142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective assessment of axial back pain symptoms before and after bariatric weight reduction surgery.
Khoueir P; Black MH; Crookes PF; Kaufman HS; Katkhouda N; Wang MY
Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):454-63. PubMed ID: 19356988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance images and linear measurements in the surgical treatment of breast asymmetry.
Pozzobon AV; Sabino Neto M; Veiga DF; Abla LE; Pereira JB; Biasi TL; Ferreira LM; Yamashita LA; Kawano F; Nakano EM; Shigueoka DC
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 18709409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
Tepper OM; Small K; Rudolph L; Choi M; Karp N
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):548-51. PubMed ID: 16978973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
