These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21551340)

  • 1. Banking on a bad bet. Probability matching in risky choice is linked to expectation generation.
    James G; Koehler DJ
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):707-11. PubMed ID: 21551340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When does information about probability count in choices under risk?
    Tyszka T; Zaleskiewicz T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1623-36. PubMed ID: 17184402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probability matching in choice under uncertainty: intuition versus deliberation.
    Koehler DJ; James G
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 19664762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do individual differences in Iowa Gambling Task performance predict adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses?
    Weller JA; Levin IP; Bechara A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2010 Feb; 32(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19484643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gambles vs. quasi-realistic scenarios: expectations to find probability and risk-defusing information.
    Huber O; Huber OW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):222-36. PubMed ID: 17603987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Of matchers and maximizers: How competition shapes choice under risk and uncertainty.
    Schulze C; van Ravenzwaaij D; Newell BR
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 May; 78():78-98. PubMed ID: 25868112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames.
    Inukai K; Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 16574332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling choice and valuation in decision experiments.
    Loomes G
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):902-24. PubMed ID: 20658857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Decision making and the Iowa Gambling Task: relevance to dependence study].
    Takano Y; Takahashi N; Hironaka N
    Nihon Arukoru Yakubutsu Igakkai Zasshi; 2010 Oct; 45(5):420-9. PubMed ID: 21226340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision by sampling: the role of the decision environment in risky choice.
    Stewart N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1041-62. PubMed ID: 19306161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the composition of risk preference and belief.
    Wakkar PP
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 14756595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The smart potential behind probability matching.
    Gaissmaier W; Schooler LJ
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 19019351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. There are at least two kinds of probability matching: evidence from a secondary task.
    Otto AR; Taylor EG; Markman AB
    Cognition; 2011 Feb; 118(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 21145046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision-making processes: sensitivity to sequentially experienced outcome probabilities.
    Boyer TW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 May; 97(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 17321540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Taking the easy way out? Increasing implementation effort reduces probability maximizing under cognitive load.
    Schulze C; Newell BR
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):806-18. PubMed ID: 26884088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mind the gap? Description, experience, and the continuum of uncertainty in risky choice.
    Camilleri AR; Newell BR
    Prog Brain Res; 2013; 202():55-71. PubMed ID: 23317826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct risk aversion: evidence from risky prospects valued below their worst outcome.
    Simonsohn U
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):686-92. PubMed ID: 19422629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision making under risk and under ambiguity in Parkinson's disease.
    Delazer M; Sinz H; Zamarian L; Stockner H; Seppi K; Wenning GK; Benke T; Poewe W
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1901-8. PubMed ID: 19428422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biases and optimality of sensory-motor and cognitive decisions.
    Trommershäuser J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 174():267-78. PubMed ID: 19477345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.