BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21552128)

  • 21. Sound localization and binaural hearing in children with a hearing aid and a cochlear implant.
    Beijen J; Snik AF; Straatman LV; Mylanus EA; Mens LH
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 19451708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sound localization under perturbed binaural hearing.
    Van Wanrooij MM; Van Opstal AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 97(1):715-26. PubMed ID: 17065242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Directional hearing in the barn owl (Tyto alba).
    Coles RB; Guppy A
    J Comp Physiol A; 1988 May; 163(1):117-33. PubMed ID: 3385664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The problem of front-back localization in binaural hearing.
    Weinrich S
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():135-45. PubMed ID: 6955921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: Polar characteristics of custom-made hearing aids.
    Chung K; McKibben N; Mongeau L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2529-42. PubMed ID: 20370035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Left-right and front-back spatial hearing with multiple directional microphone configurations in modern hearing aids.
    Carette E; Van den Bogaert T; Laureyns M; Wouters J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):791-803. PubMed ID: 25405835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Age-related hearing loss and ear morphology affect vertical but not horizontal sound-localization performance.
    Otte RJ; Agterberg MJ; Van Wanrooij MM; Snik AF; Van Opstal AJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Apr; 14(2):261-73. PubMed ID: 23319012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimal head related transfer functions for hearing and monaural localization in elevation: a signal processing design perspective.
    Rao KR; Ben-Arie J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Nov; 43(11):1093-105. PubMed ID: 9214827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of different binaural hearing aid systems for sound localization in the horizontal and vertical planes.
    Noble W; Byrne D
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Oct; 24(5):335-46. PubMed ID: 2265304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bilateral digital hearing aids for binaural hearing.
    Kimberley BP; Dymond R; Gamer A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 8205979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using a signal cancellation technique involving impulse response to assess directivity of hearing aids.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3214-26. PubMed ID: 20000935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Sound localization cues of binaural hearing].
    Paulus E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2003 Apr; 82(4):240-8. PubMed ID: 12717598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sound localization, sound lateralization, and binaural masking level differences in young children with normal hearing.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Van den Bogaert T; Scherf F; Offeciers FE; Van de Heyning PH; Desloovere C; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; De Raeve L; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):178-90. PubMed ID: 19194296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An influence of binaural hearing aids on positioning of sound images.
    Nábĕlek AK; Letowski T; Mason D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Sep; 23(3):670-87. PubMed ID: 7421165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hearing aids using binaural processing principles.
    Van Compernolle D
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():76-84. PubMed ID: 2356740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 188(1-2):70-88. PubMed ID: 14759572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Plasticity in human directional hearing.
    Javer AR; Schwarz DW
    J Otolaryngol; 1995 Apr; 24(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 7602671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Amplification of interaural level differences improves sound localization in acoustic simulations of bimodal hearing.
    Francart T; Van den Bogaert T; Moonen M; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3209-13. PubMed ID: 20000934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.
    Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 18391567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.