These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21552712)

  • 1. Craniofacial characteristics of Caucasian and Afro-Caucasian Brazilian subjects with normal occlusion.
    Janson G; Quaglio CL; Pinzan A; Franco EJ; de Freitas MR
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Apr; 19(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 21552712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue characteristics in white and black Brazilian subjects.
    de Freitas LM; de Freitas KM; Pinzan A; Janson G; de Freitas MR
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 20485924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facial height comparison in young white and black Brazilian subjects with normal occlusion.
    de Freitas LM; Pinzan A; Janson G; Freitas KM; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):706.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17561045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 20709723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in craniofacial and dental characteristics of adolescent Mexican Americans and European Americans.
    Vela E; Taylor RW; Campbell PM; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):839-47. PubMed ID: 22133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Craniofacial skeletal and soft tissue morphology in Icelandic adults.
    Johannsdottir B; Thordarson A; Magnusson TE
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15222707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial height in Japanese-Brazilian descendants with normal occlusion.
    Vieira FP; Pinzan A; Janson G; Fernandes TM; Sathler RC; Henriques RP
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):54-66. PubMed ID: 25715717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative cephalometric study of three different ethnic groups of black Africa with normal occlusion.
    Beugre JB; Sonan NK; Beugre-Kouassi AM; Djaha F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2007 Mar; 30(117):34-44. PubMed ID: 17654886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 7942657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric norms for Central Indian population using Burstone and Legan analysis.
    Yadav AO; Walia CS; Borle RM; Chaoji KH; Rajan R; Datarkar AN
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 21525673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mesh diagram analysis: developing a norm for African Americans.
    Faustini MM; Hale C; Cisneros GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 9107376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between craniofacial structures, anthropometric measurements, and nasopharyngeal dimensions in black adolescents.
    Al-Jewair T; Marwah S; Preston CB; Wu Y; Yu G
    Int Orthod; 2021 Mar; 19(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 33516651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults.
    Alcalde RE; Jinno T; Pogrel MA; Matsumura T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 56(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 9461133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
    Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with Class I occlusion.
    Al-Jewair TS; Preston CB; Flores-Mir C; Ziarnowski P
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(2):37-45. PubMed ID: 29898156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bimaxillary protrusion in the Caucasian: a cephalometric study of the morphological features.
    Keating PJ
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 12(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 3863675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft tissue thickness in Brazilian adults of different skeletal classes and facial types: A cone beam CT - Study.
    Farias Gomes A; Moreira DD; Zanon MF; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Nov; 47():101743. PubMed ID: 32659706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative cephalometric study of the airways between different ethnic groups with normal occlusion.
    Zambrano G; Guerra JGP; Soviero LD; Peloso RM; Miranda F; Freitas KMS; Pinzan A; Freitas MR
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2024; 29(2):e2423206. PubMed ID: 38775599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.