142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21553991)
1. When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted.
Frings C; Amendt A; Spence C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1174-81. PubMed ID: 21553991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased perceptual and conceptual processing difficulty makes the immeasurable measurable: negative priming in the absence of probe distractors.
Frings C; Spence C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 21077720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial coordinate systems for tactile spatial attention depend on developmental vision: evidence from event-related potentials in sighted and congenitally blind adult humans.
Röder B; Föcker J; Hötting K; Spence C
Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 28(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 18702719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Where has all the inhibition gone? Insights from electrophysiological measures into negative priming without probe distractors.
Groh-Bordin C; Frings C
Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 19619926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Target-to-target repetition cost and location negative priming are dissociable: evidence for different mechanisms.
Chao HF
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1074-82. PubMed ID: 21553994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Blindness enhances tactile acuity and haptic 3-D shape discrimination.
Norman JF; Bartholomew AN
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2323-31. PubMed ID: 21671153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tactile and visual distractors induce change blindness for tactile stimuli presented on the fingertips.
Auvray M; Gallace A; Hartcher-O'Brien J; Tan HZ; Spence C
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1213():111-9. PubMed ID: 18448084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implicit processing of tactile information: evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm.
Pritchett D; Gallace A; Spence C
Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):534-46. PubMed ID: 21459622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revisiting the role of probe distractors in negative priming: location negative priming is observed when probe distractors are consistently absent.
Chao HF
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1072-82. PubMed ID: 19525538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Event-related potential evidence for the use of external coordinates in the preparation of tactile attention by the early blind.
Eardley AF; van Velzen J
Eur J Neurosci; 2011 May; 33(10):1897-907. PubMed ID: 21545656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Crossmodal change blindness between vision and touch.
Auvray M; Gallace A; Tan HZ; Spence C
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Oct; 126(2):79-97. PubMed ID: 17187750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Congenital blindness leads to enhanced vibrotactile perception.
Wan CY; Wood AG; Reutens DC; Wilson SJ
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):631-5. PubMed ID: 19819246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The superiority in voice processing of the blind arises from neural plasticity at sensory processing stages.
Föcker J; Best A; Hölig C; Röder B
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):2056-67. PubMed ID: 22588063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Altered tactile spatial attention in the early blind.
Forster B; Eardley AF; Eimer M
Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1131(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 17173872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attention and sensory interactions within the occipital cortex in the early blind: an fMRI study.
Weaver KE; Stevens AA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 19(2):315-30. PubMed ID: 17280519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
Sambo CF; Forster B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical period for cross-modal plasticity in blind humans: a functional MRI study.
Sadato N; Okada T; Honda M; Yonekura Y
Neuroimage; 2002 Jun; 16(2):389-400. PubMed ID: 12030824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
