142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21553991)
21. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.
Holmes NP; Sanabria D; Calvert GA; Spence C
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 16483553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Separating after-effects of target and distractor processing in the tactile sensory modality.
Wesslein AK; Moeller B; Frings C; Giesen C
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):809-822. PubMed ID: 30628034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A behavioral study of distraction by vibrotactile novelty.
Parmentier FB; Ljungberg JK; Elsley JV; Lindkvist M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21517219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Negative priming is stronger for task-relevant dimensions: Evidence of flexibility in the selective ignoring of distractor information.
Frings C; Wentura D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):683-93. PubMed ID: 16707357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Numerical Priming Between Touch and Vision Depends on Tactile Discrimination.
Faivre N; Salomon R; Vuillaume L; Blanke O
Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):114-24. PubMed ID: 26562854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. When visual transients impair tactile change detection: a novel case of crossmodal change blindness?
Gallace A; Auvray M; Tan HZ; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2006 May; 398(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 16480821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distractor variation on auditory selective attention.
Tong Y; Melara RD
Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1166():110-23. PubMed ID: 17669371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tactile acuity in the blind: a closer look reveals superiority over the sighted in some but not all cutaneous tasks.
Alary F; Duquette M; Goldstein R; Elaine Chapman C; Voss P; La Buissonnière-Ariza V; Lepore F
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2037-43. PubMed ID: 19467354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The involvement of occipital cortex in the early blind in auditory and tactile duration discrimination tasks.
Van der Lubbe RH; Van Mierlo CM; Postma A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 22(7):1541-56. PubMed ID: 19580388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Audiotactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind individuals.
Occelli V; Spence C; Zampini M
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2845-50. PubMed ID: 18603271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. When vision influences the invisible distractor: tactile response compatibility effects require vision.
Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 24245501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.
Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Beyond visual, aural and haptic movement perception: hMT+ is activated by electrotactile motion stimulation of the tongue in sighted and in congenitally blind individuals.
Matteau I; Kupers R; Ricciardi E; Pietrini P; Ptito M
Brain Res Bull; 2010 Jul; 82(5-6):264-70. PubMed ID: 20466041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.
Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I
Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Seeing the body modulates audiotactile integration.
Aspell JE; Lavanchy T; Lenggenhager B; Blanke O
Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1868-73. PubMed ID: 20584191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Auditory, tactile, and audiotactile information processing following visual deprivation.
Occelli V; Spence C; Zampini M
Psychol Bull; 2013 Jan; 139(1):189-212. PubMed ID: 22612281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Electrophysiological correlates of visual identity negative priming.
Frings C; Groh-Bordin C
Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1176():82-91. PubMed ID: 17904111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Short term memory for tactile stimuli.
Gallace A; Tan HZ; Haggard P; Spence C
Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1190():132-42. PubMed ID: 18083147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
