These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21553991)

  • 41. Haptic orientation perception benefits from visual experience: evidence from early-blind, late-blind, and sighted people.
    Postma A; Zuidhoek S; Noordzij ML; Kappers AM
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1197-206. PubMed ID: 18927003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Tactile-'visual' acuity of the tongue in early blind individuals.
    Chebat DR; Rainville C; Kupers R; Ptito M
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1901-4. PubMed ID: 18007183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Auditory-tactile speech perception in congenitally blind and sighted adults.
    Sato M; Cavé C; Ménard L; Brasseur A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3683-6. PubMed ID: 20736028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming.
    Mayr S; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):932-43. PubMed ID: 16846289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Tactile spatial negative priming occurs without feature mismatch.
    Frings C; Mast F; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2305-14. PubMed ID: 24944106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition.
    Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Walton M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):47-70. PubMed ID: 15627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The cognitive and neural correlates of "tactile consciousness": a multisensory perspective.
    Gallace A; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):370-407. PubMed ID: 17398116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A spatial frequency account of the detriment that local processing of Navon letters has on face recognition.
    Hills PJ; Lewis MB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1427-42. PubMed ID: 19803647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Identity-Based Crossmodal Negative Priming: Aftereffects of Ignoring in One Sensory Modality on Responding to Another Sensory Modality.
    Wesslein AK; Frings C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Aug; 33(7):703-721. PubMed ID: 32101789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Directed and divided attention during hierarchical processing in patients with visuo-spatial neglect and matched healthy volunteers.
    Lux S; Thimm M; Marshall JC; Fink GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16005032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Event-related potentials during auditory and somatosensory discrimination in sighted and blind human subjects.
    Röder B; Rösler F; Hennighausen E; Näcker F
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1996 Sep; 4(2):77-93. PubMed ID: 8883921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Aging and cognitive slowing: example of attentional processes--evaluation procedures and related questions].
    Eusop E; Sebban C; Piette F
    Encephale; 2001; 27(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11294037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Strategy effects counteract distractor inhibition: negative priming with constantly absent probe distractors.
    Frings C; Wentura D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):854-64. PubMed ID: 16846284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Ichihara S
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 15460924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sequential vs simultaneous encoding of spatial information: a comparison between the blind and the sighted.
    Ruotolo F; Ruggiero G; Vinciguerra M; Iachini T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Feb; 139(2):382-9. PubMed ID: 22192440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is modulated by semantic processing.
    Huang YM; Baddeley A; Young AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 18377174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Tactile memory in sighted and blind observers: the influence of orientation and rate of presentation.
    Heller MA
    Perception; 1989; 18(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 2771591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.