These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21553993)

  • 1. Cue and target processing modulate the onset of inhibition of return.
    Gabay S; Chica AB; Charras P; Funes MJ; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21553993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orienting of attention, pupil size, and the norepinephrine system.
    Gabay S; Pertzov Y; Henik A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 21258914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibition of return in aging and Alzheimer's disease: performance as a function of task demands and stimulus timing.
    Langley LK; Fuentes LJ; Hochhalter AK; Brandt J; Overmier JB
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Aug; 23(4):431-46. PubMed ID: 11780944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does cue processing modulate inhibition of return in a detection task?
    Zhou B; Yang T; Bao Y
    Psych J; 2019 Mar; 8(1):158-164. PubMed ID: 30375191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the costs and benefits of repeating a nonspatial feature in an exogenous spatial cuing paradigm.
    Klein RM; Wang Y; Dukewich KR; He S; Hu K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2293-304. PubMed ID: 26153659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1307-15. PubMed ID: 18723045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The involvement of bottom-up saliency processing in endogenous inhibition of return.
    Henderickx D; Maetens K; Soetens E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):285-99. PubMed ID: 22038667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deficient inhibition of return for emotional faces in depression.
    Dai Q; Feng Z
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Aug; 33(6):921-32. PubMed ID: 19394388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.
    Lupiáñez J; Milliken B; Solano C; Weaver B; Tipper SP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):753-73. PubMed ID: 11548033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Letter processing interferes with inhibition of return: evidence for cortical involvement.
    Bowles B; Ferber S; Pratt J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 15894469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two components in IOR: evidence for response bias and perceptual processing delays using the SAT methodology.
    Zhao Y; Heinke D; Ivanoff J; Klein RM; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2143-59. PubMed ID: 21789695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition.
    Visser TA; Barnes D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining the influence of a spatially irrelevant working memory load on attentional allocation.
    McDonnell GP; Dodd MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):933-40. PubMed ID: 23477696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining inhibition of return with onset and offset cues in the multiple-cuing paradigm.
    Birmingham E; Pratt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):101-21. PubMed ID: 15627412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality.
    van der Lubbe RH; Havik MM; Bekker EM; Postma A
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar; 43(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 16712585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical expressions of inhibition of return.
    Prime DJ; Ward LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1072(1):161-74. PubMed ID: 16445889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching.
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 20565215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exogenous phasic alerting and spatial orienting in mild cognitive impairment compared to healthy ageing: Study outcome is related to target response.
    Tales A; Snowden RJ; Phillips M; Haworth J; Porter G; Wilcock G; Bayer A
    Cortex; 2011 Feb; 47(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 19846073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of implicit attentional learning and habituation on inhibition of return.
    Wolf K; Ebeling D; Müller NG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 19304594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.