177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21553994)
1. Target-to-target repetition cost and location negative priming are dissociable: evidence for different mechanisms.
Chao HF
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1074-82. PubMed ID: 21553994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revisiting the role of probe distractors in negative priming: location negative priming is observed when probe distractors are consistently absent.
Chao HF
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1072-82. PubMed ID: 19525538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of cueing target location and response mode on interference and negative priming using a visual selection paradigm.
Richards A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):449-63. PubMed ID: 10428686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted.
Frings C; Amendt A; Spence C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1174-81. PubMed ID: 21553991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.
Wang L; Yue Z; Chen Q
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):867-78. PubMed ID: 22415447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysing the relationship between target-to-target and distractor-to-target repetitions: evidence for a common mechanism.
Frings C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1641-9. PubMed ID: 18609398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?
Munneke J; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18589391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cortical expressions of inhibition of return.
Prime DJ; Ward LM
Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1072(1):161-74. PubMed ID: 16445889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unimpaired negative but enhanced positive priming in Parkinson's disease: evidence from an identity and a location priming task.
Troche SJ; Trenkwalder C; Morelli-Canelo M; Gibbons H; Rammsayer TH
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1811-21. PubMed ID: 16620885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention.
Lamy D; Antebi C; Aviani N; Carmel T
Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 18054983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial and identity negative priming in audition: evidence of feature binding in auditory spatial memory.
Mayr S; Buchner A; Möller M; Hauke R
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1710-32. PubMed ID: 21590513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flanker negative priming from spatially unpredictable primes: an ERP study.
Gibbons H; Frings C
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 20079389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of within-dimension singleton priming in visual search.
Lamy D; Bar-Anan Y; Egeth HE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):268-85. PubMed ID: 18377170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Negative priming is stronger for task-relevant dimensions: Evidence of flexibility in the selective ignoring of distractor information.
Frings C; Wentura D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):683-93. PubMed ID: 16707357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information.
Lupiáñez J; Milliken B
J Gen Psychol; 1999 Oct; 126(4):392-418. PubMed ID: 10555867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic versus volitional orienting and the production of the inhibition-of-return effect.
Fitzgeorge L; Buckolz E
Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Jun; 63(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 19485600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of prime-target spatial separation and attentional deployment on masked repetition priming.
Marzouki Y; Meeter M; Grainger J
Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1393-400. PubMed ID: 18927022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The attentional white bear phenomenon: the mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations.
Tsal Y; Makovski T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):351-63. PubMed ID: 16634675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of age and task demands on visual selective attention.
McLaughlin PM; Szostak C; Binns MA; Craik FI; Tipper SP; Stuss DT
Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Sep; 64(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 20873916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
