BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21554709)

  • 21. A novel statistical method for quantitative comparison of multiple ChIP-seq datasets.
    Chen L; Wang C; Qin ZS; Wu H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jun; 31(12):1889-96. PubMed ID: 25682068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. ChIP-chip versus ChIP-seq: lessons for experimental design and data analysis.
    Ho JW; Bishop E; Karchenko PV; Nègre N; White KP; Park PJ
    BMC Genomics; 2011 Feb; 12():134. PubMed ID: 21356108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Empirical methods for controlling false positives and estimating confidence in ChIP-Seq peaks.
    Nix DA; Courdy SJ; Boucher KM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():523. PubMed ID: 19061503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A practical comparison of methods for detecting transcription factor binding sites in ChIP-seq experiments.
    Laajala TD; Raghav S; Tuomela S; Lahesmaa R; Aittokallio T; Elo LL
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Dec; 10():618. PubMed ID: 20017957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cloud-based uniform ChIP-Seq processing tools for modENCODE and ENCODE.
    Trinh QM; Jen FY; Zhou Z; Chu KM; Perry MD; Kephart ET; Contrino S; Ruzanov P; Stein LD
    BMC Genomics; 2013 Jul; 14():494. PubMed ID: 23875683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Features that define the best ChIP-seq peak calling algorithms.
    Thomas R; Thomas S; Holloway AK; Pollard KS
    Brief Bioinform; 2017 May; 18(3):441-450. PubMed ID: 27169896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative analysis of ChIP-exo peak-callers: impact of data quality, read duplication and binding subtypes.
    Sharma V; Majumdar S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):65. PubMed ID: 32085702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FisherMP: fully parallel algorithm for detecting combinatorial motifs from large ChIP-seq datasets.
    Zhang S; Liang Y; Wang X; Su Z; Chen Y
    DNA Res; 2019 Jun; 26(3):231-242. PubMed ID: 30957858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is this the right normalization? A diagnostic tool for ChIP-seq normalization.
    Angelini C; Heller R; Volkinshtein R; Yekutieli D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():150. PubMed ID: 25957089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. AIControl: replacing matched control experiments with machine learning improves ChIP-seq peak identification.
    Hiranuma N; Lundberg SM; Lee SI
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jun; 47(10):e58. PubMed ID: 30869146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deep-learning optimized DEOCSU suite provides an iterable pipeline for accurate ChIP-exo peak calling.
    Bang I; Lee SM; Park S; Park JY; Nong LK; Gao Y; Palsson BO; Kim D
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36702751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Triform algorithm: improved sensitivity and specificity in ChIP-Seq peak finding.
    Kornacker K; Rye MB; Håndstad T; Drabløs F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():176. PubMed ID: 22827163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ChIP-seq Data Processing for PcG Proteins and Associated Histone Modifications.
    Bogdanovic O; van Heeringen SJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1480():37-53. PubMed ID: 27659973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. FindPeaks 3.1: a tool for identifying areas of enrichment from massively parallel short-read sequencing technology.
    Fejes AP; Robertson G; Bilenky M; Varhol R; Bainbridge M; Jones SJ
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1729-30. PubMed ID: 18599518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. SigSeeker: a peak-calling ensemble approach for constructing epigenetic signatures.
    Lichtenberg J; Elnitski L; Bodine DM
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 33(17):2615-2621. PubMed ID: 28449120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Active promoters give rise to false positive 'Phantom Peaks' in ChIP-seq experiments.
    Jain D; Baldi S; Zabel A; Straub T; Becker PB
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Aug; 43(14):6959-68. PubMed ID: 26117547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensitive and robust assessment of ChIP-seq read distribution using a strand-shift profile.
    Nakato R; Shirahige K
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(14):2356-2363. PubMed ID: 29528371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. ChIPseqR: analysis of ChIP-seq experiments.
    Humburg P; Helliwell CA; Bulger D; Stone G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():39. PubMed ID: 21281468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A MAD-Bayes Algorithm for State-Space Inference and Clustering with Application to Querying Large Collections of ChIP-Seq Data Sets.
    Zuo C; Chen K; Keleş S
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):472-485. PubMed ID: 27835030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Software for rapid time dependent ChIP-sequencing analysis (TDCA).
    Myschyshyn M; Farren-Dai M; Chuang TJ; Vocadlo D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):521. PubMed ID: 29178831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.