141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21555028)
1. Editorial comment.
Peters CA
J Urol; 2011 Jun; 185(6 Suppl):2522. PubMed ID: 21555028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the learning curve and outcomes of robotic assisted pediatric pyeloplasty.
Sorensen MD; Delostrinos C; Johnson MH; Grady RW; Lendvay TS
J Urol; 2011 Jun; 185(6 Suppl):2517-22. PubMed ID: 21555027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Editorial comment.
Farhat WA
J Urol; 2011 Apr; 185(4):1460. PubMed ID: 21334644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Editorial comment.
Hindley RG; Barber N
Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1040; author reply 1041. PubMed ID: 19883816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Editorial comment.
Kass EJ
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2433; discussion 2434. PubMed ID: 19765767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Editorial comment.
Castagnetti M
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2432-3; discussion 2434. PubMed ID: 19765750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial comment.
Farhat WA
J Urol; 2011 Apr; 185(4):1467; author reply 1468. PubMed ID: 21334646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Jin XB; Li P; Jiang SB; Wang MW; Xia QH; Zhao Y; Xiong H; Sun P; Chen XD
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Feb; 121(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 18304474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Editorial comment on: Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
Novara G
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):857-8. PubMed ID: 19359085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Murphy D; Challacombe B; Elhage O; Khan MS; Dasgupta P
BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):136-51. PubMed ID: 18564236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Editorial comment.
Lorenzo AJ
J Urol; 2011 Mar; 185(3):1069-70. PubMed ID: 21262511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Editorial comment.
Wolf JS
Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1034; author reply 1034-5. PubMed ID: 19883815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial comment.
Farhat WA
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1566-7; discussion 1568. PubMed ID: 19683761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Editorial comment.
González R
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1567; discussion 1568. PubMed ID: 19683755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial comment.
Peters CA
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1567-8; discussion 1568. PubMed ID: 19683754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Partial ureteropelvic junction obstruction managed by robotic excision and ureteropyelostomy.
Richards KA; Singh I; Hemal AK
Can J Urol; 2009 Dec; 16(6):4932-5. PubMed ID: 20003672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term experience and outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children and young adults.
Minnillo BJ; Cruz JA; Sayao RH; Passerotti CC; Houck CS; Meier PM; Borer JG; Diamond DA; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
J Urol; 2011 Apr; 185(4):1455-60. PubMed ID: 21334663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Editorial comment on: Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
Fornara P; Greco F
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):858. PubMed ID: 19359090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Re: Editorial comment. D. A. Canning, J Urol 2006; 176: 2242.
Griffin SJ; Steinbrecher HA
J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2399; author reply 2399-400. PubMed ID: 17509374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial comment.
Merguerian PA
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):681; author reply 681. PubMed ID: 21172703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
