141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21555028)
41. Role of robotics in laparoscopic urologic surgery.
Eichel L; Ahlering TE; Clayman RV
Urol Clin North Am; 2004 Nov; 31(4):781-92. PubMed ID: 15474606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Robot-assisted urologic and general telesurgery].
Olsen LH
Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Feb; 166(8):690-2. PubMed ID: 15042813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Role of robotics in modern urologic practice.
Su LM
Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):63-4. PubMed ID: 19057218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey.
Freilich DA; Penna FJ; Nelson CP; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):704-8. PubMed ID: 20022046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Re: Transmesenteric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. F. R. Romero, A. A. Wagner, C. Trapp, S. Permpongkosol, M. Muntener, R. E. Link and L. R. Kavoussi, J Urol 2006; 176: 2526-2529.
Seckiner I
J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2397; author reply 2397-8. PubMed ID: 17509370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Editorial comment.
Richstone L; Kavoussi L
Urology; 2009 Oct; 74(4):812; author reply 812-3. PubMed ID: 19800501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Editorial comment.
Cadeddu JA
Urology; 2009 Oct; 74(4):812. PubMed ID: 19800500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Re: A clinical pathway for laparoscopic pyeloplasty decreases length of stay.
Khurana N; Mandhani A
J Urol; 2006 Jan; 175(1):390; author reply 391. PubMed ID: 16406946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Editorial comment.
Koh CJ
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2226-7. PubMed ID: 24050912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre.
Schwentner C; Pelzer A; Neururer R; Springer B; Horninger W; Bartsch G; Peschel R
BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):880-5. PubMed ID: 17535275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Editorial comment.
Frimberger D
Urology; 2010 Jul; 76(1):174; author reply 174. PubMed ID: 20599113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparing the learning curve for robotically assisted and straight stick laparoscopic procedures in surgical novices.
Rashid TG; Kini M; Ind TE
Int J Med Robot; 2010 Sep; 6(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 20533536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults and children: lessons learned.
Kojima Y; Umemoto Y; Mizuno K; Tozawa K; Kohri K; Hayashi Y
J Urol; 2011 Apr; 185(4):1461-7. PubMed ID: 21334661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery.
Lee RS; Retik AB; Borer JG; Peters CA
J Urol; 2006 Feb; 175(2):683-7; discussion 687. PubMed ID: 16407025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Laparoscopic pyeloplasty].
Stolzenburg JU
Aktuelle Urol; 2003 Mar; 34(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 14566697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Robotic pyeloplasty--the new standard of care?
Peters CA
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1223-4. PubMed ID: 18707738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The current status of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Rose K; Khan S; Dasgupta P
Int J Clin Pract; 2006 Jan; 60(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 16409420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. LESS: 'Where's the meat'?
Rane A; Cadeddu JA
BJU Int; 2011 Jul; 108(2):157. PubMed ID: 21718428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a transatlantic comparison of techniques and outcomes.
Chammas MF; Hubert J; Patel VR
BJU Int; 2007 May; 99(5):1113-7. PubMed ID: 17437442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Robotically assisted surgery in pediatric urology.
Peters CA
Urol Clin North Am; 2004 Nov; 31(4):743-52. PubMed ID: 15474601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
