377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21555337)
21. The direct peptide reactivity assay: selectivity of chemical respiratory allergens.
Lalko JF; Kimber I; Gerberick GF; Foertsch LM; Api AM; Dearman RJ
Toxicol Sci; 2012 Oct; 129(2):421-31. PubMed ID: 22713598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro approaches to the identification and characterization of skin sensitizers.
Basketter D; Maxwell G
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):359-73. PubMed ID: 18058309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A conjugated diene identified as a prohapten: contact allergenic activity and chemical reactivity of proposed epoxide metabolites.
Nilsson AM; Bergström MA; Luthman K; Nilsson JL; Karlberg AT
Chem Res Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 18(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 15720137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Method for detecting the reactivity of chemicals towards peptides as an alternative test method for assessing skin sensitization potential.
Cho SA; Jeong YH; Kim JH; Kim S; Cho JC; Heo Y; Suh KD; Shin K; An S
Toxicol Lett; 2014 Feb; 225(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 24362008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hapten-protein binding: from theory to practical application in the in vitro prediction of skin sensitization.
Divkovic M; Pease CK; Gerberick GF; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Oct; 53(4):189-200. PubMed ID: 16191014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Relating skin sensitizing potency to chemical reactivity: reactive Michael acceptors inhibit NF-κB signaling and are less sensitizing than S(N)Ar- and S(N)2- reactive chemicals.
Natsch A; Haupt T; Laue H
Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Nov; 24(11):2018-27. PubMed ID: 22023385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The selective peptide reactivity of chemical respiratory allergens under competitive and non-competitive conditions.
Lalko JF; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Api AM; Gerberick GF
J Immunotoxicol; 2013; 10(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 23050863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing.
Natsch A; Emter R; Ellis G
Toxicol Sci; 2009 Jan; 107(1):106-21. PubMed ID: 18832184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reactivity of chemical sensitizers toward amino acids in cellulo plays a role in the activation of the Nrf2-ARE pathway in human monocyte dendritic cells and the THP-1 cell line.
Migdal C; Botton J; El Ali Z; Azoury ME; Guldemann J; Giménez-Arnau E; Lepoittevin JP; Kerdine-Römer S; Pallardy M
Toxicol Sci; 2013 Jun; 133(2):259-74. PubMed ID: 23535360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Metabolic epoxidation of an alpha,beta-unsaturated oxime generates sensitizers of extreme potency. Are nitroso intermediates responsible?
Bergström MA; Luthman K; Karlberg AT
Chem Res Toxicol; 2007 Jun; 20(6):927-36. PubMed ID: 17511479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A new in vitro method for identifying chemical sensitizers combining peptide binding with ARE/EpRE-mediated gene expression in human skin cells.
McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2010 Sep; 29(3):171-92. PubMed ID: 20491607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A novel in chemico method to detect skin sensitizers in highly diluted reaction conditions.
Yamamoto Y; Tahara H; Usami R; Kasahara T; Jimbo Y; Hioki T; Fujita M
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1348-60. PubMed ID: 25809859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Chemical reactivity and skin sensitization potential for benzaldehydes: can Schiff base formation explain everything?
Natsch A; Gfeller H; Haupt T; Brunner G
Chem Res Toxicol; 2012 Oct; 25(10):2203-15. PubMed ID: 22950880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative and mechanistic read across for predicting the skin sensitization potential of alkenes acting via Michael addition.
Enoch SJ; Cronin MT; Schultz TW; Madden JC
Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 21(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 18189367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Skin sensitizers induce antioxidant response element dependent genes: application to the in vitro testing of the sensitization potential of chemicals.
Natsch A; Emter R
Toxicol Sci; 2008 Mar; 102(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 17932397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Critical Evaluation of Low-Molecular Weight Respiratory Sensitizers and Their Protein Reactivity Potential Toward Lysine Residues.
Krutz NL; Kimber I; Ryan CA; Kern PS; Gerberick GF
Toxicol Sci; 2021 Aug; 182(2):346-354. PubMed ID: 34003265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of Pre- and Pro-haptens Using Nonanimal Test Methods for Skin Sensitization.
Urbisch D; Becker M; Honarvar N; Kolle SN; Mehling A; Teubner W; Wareing B; Landsiedel R
Chem Res Toxicol; 2016 May; 29(5):901-13. PubMed ID: 27070937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Identification of pre- and pro-haptens with a β-galactosidase-expressing E. coli culture system for skin sensitization.
Nepal MR; Kang MJ; Kim GH; Cha DH; Nam DH; Jeong TC
Toxicol Lett; 2019 May; 305():81-93. PubMed ID: 30711672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
