These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21556181)

  • 1. Subjects agree to participate in environmental health studies without fully comprehending the associated risk.
    Lee R; Lampert S; Wilder L; Sowell AL
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 Mar; 8(3):830-41. PubMed ID: 21556181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Well-Informed Potential Trial Participants More Likely to Participate?
    de Oliveira LLH; Vissoci JRN; Machado WL; Rodrigues CG; Limkakeng AT
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):363-371. PubMed ID: 29073806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlates of lower comprehension of informed consent among participants enrolled in a cohort study in Pune, India.
    Joglekar NS; Deshpande SS; Sahay S; Ghate MV; Bollinger RC; Mehendale SM
    Int Health; 2013 Mar; 5(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 24029848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Views of clinical trial participants on the readability and their understanding of informed consent documents.
    Somers R; Van Staden C; Steffens F
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(4):277-284. PubMed ID: 29111872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic informed consent considering information load and serial position effect.
    Pawlak CE; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):363-72. PubMed ID: 25726404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perspectives of IRB chairs on the informed consent process.
    Kane EI; Gallo JJ
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 28949842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement.
    Perrault EK; Nazione SA
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 27329533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Undergraduate Consent Form Reading in Relation to Conscientiousness, Procrastination, and the Point-of-Time Effect.
    Theiss JD; Hobbs WB; Giordano PJ; Brunson OM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):11-7. PubMed ID: 25746782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Too Dense and Too Detailed: Evaluation of the Health Literacy Attributes of an Informed Consent Document.
    Simonds VW; Buchwald D
    J Racial Ethn Health Disparities; 2020 Apr; 7(2):327-335. PubMed ID: 31823337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study.
    Sudore RL; Landefeld CS; Williams BA; Barnes DE; Lindquist K; Schillinger D
    J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Aug; 21(8):867-73. PubMed ID: 16881949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed Consent for Online Research-Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms.
    Geier C; Adams RB; Mitchell KM; Holtz BE
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2021 Jul; 16(3):154-164. PubMed ID: 34029168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research.
    Ogloff JR; Otto RK
    Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):239-52. PubMed ID: 11651140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Readability and Understanding of Informed Consent Among Participants With Low Incomes: A Preliminary Report.
    Ittenbach RF; Senft EC; Huang G; Corsmo JJ; Sieber JE
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):444-8. PubMed ID: 26564942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing decisional capacity for research participation in psychiatric patients and their relatives.
    George DE; Dholakia S; Tharyan P
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2018; 3(2):125-133. PubMed ID: 28918381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Parents'/Guardians' Initial Comprehension and 1-Day Recall of Elements of Informed Consent Within a Mozambican Study of Pediatric Bacteremia.
    Ossemane EB; Moon TD; Sacarlal J; Sevene E; Kenga D; Gong W; Heitman E
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Jul; 13(3):247-257. PubMed ID: 29667543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review.
    Foe G; Larson EL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Feb; 11(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 27106889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Post-consent assessment of dental subjects' understanding of informed consent in oral health research in Nigeria.
    Taiwo OO; Kass N
    BMC Med Ethics; 2009 Aug; 10():11. PubMed ID: 19646279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concise Consent Forms Appreciated-Still Not Comprehended: Applying Revised Common Rule Guidelines in Online Studies.
    Perrault EK; McCullock SP
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Oct; 14(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 31169051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehension of information for informed consent by spouses of surgical patients.
    Silva MC
    Res Nurs Health; 1985 Jun; 8(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 3849032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the ability of clinical research participants to comprehend informed consent form.
    Bhansali S; Shafiq N; Malhotra S; Pandhi P; Singh I; Venkateshan SP; Siddhu S; Sharma YP; Talwar KK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):427-30. PubMed ID: 19341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.