These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21556188)

  • 1. CCS activities being performed by the U.S. DOE.
    Dressel B; Deel D; Rodosta T; Plasynski S; Litynski J; Myer L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 Feb; 8(2):300-20. PubMed ID: 21556188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program Validation Phase.
    Litynski JT; Plasynski S; McIlvried HG; Mahoney C; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2008 Jan; 34(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 17950875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
    Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mesoscale carbon sequestration site screening and CCS infrastructure analysis.
    Keating GN; Middleton RS; Stauffer PH; Viswanathan HS; Letellier BC; Pasqualini D; Pawar RJ; Wolfsberg AV
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):215-22. PubMed ID: 20698546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
    White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deployment models for commercialized carbon capture and storage.
    Esposito RA; Monroe LS; Friedman JS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 20722437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial stochastic modeling of sedimentary formations to assess CO2 storage potential.
    Popova OH; Small MJ; McCoy ST; Thomas AC; Rose S; Karimi B; Carter K; Goodman A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jun; 48(11):6247-55. PubMed ID: 24824160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. U-tube based near-surface environmental monitoring in the Shenhua carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) project.
    Li Q; Song R; Shi H; Ma J; Liu X; Li X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Apr; 25(12):12034-12052. PubMed ID: 29453717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Framework for the assessment of interaction between CO2 geological storage and other sedimentary basin resources.
    Michael K; Whittaker S; Varma S; Bekele E; Langhi L; Hodgkinson J; Harris B
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Feb; 18(2):164-75. PubMed ID: 26767550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Water challenges for geologic carbon capture and sequestration.
    Newmark RL; Friedmann SJ; Carroll SA
    Environ Manage; 2010 Apr; 45(4):651-61. PubMed ID: 20127328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trace metal source terms in carbon sequestration environments.
    Karamalidis AK; Torres SG; Hakala JA; Shao H; Cantrell KJ; Carroll S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):322-9. PubMed ID: 23215015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of a perfluorocarbon tracer based network to support monitoring, verification, and accounting of sequestered CO₂.
    Watson TB; Sullivan T
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Feb; 46(3):1692-9. PubMed ID: 22243211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CO
    Rastelli E; Corinaldesi C; Dell'Anno A; Amaro T; Greco S; Lo Martire M; Carugati L; Queirós AM; Widdicombe S; Danovaro R
    Mar Environ Res; 2016 Dec; 122():158-168. PubMed ID: 27816195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States.
    Baik E; Sanchez DL; Turner PA; Mach KJ; Field CB; Benson SM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(13):3290-3295. PubMed ID: 29531081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Energy and CO
    Bartholomew TV; Mauter MS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Apr; 55(8):4305-4313. PubMed ID: 33764042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the carbon sequestration capacity of shale formations using methane production rates.
    Tao Z; Clarens A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Oct; 47(19):11318-25. PubMed ID: 23988277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential restrictions for CO2 sequestration sites due to shale and tight gas production.
    Elliot TR; Celia MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Apr; 46(7):4223-7. PubMed ID: 22352312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Permanent carbon dioxide storage in deep-sea sediments.
    House KZ; Schrag DP; Harvey CF; Lackner KS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Aug; 103(33):12291-5. PubMed ID: 16894174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An optimal centralized carbon dioxide repository for Florida, USA.
    Poiencot B; Brown C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 Apr; 8(4):955-975. PubMed ID: 21695024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CO(2) capture and geologic storage: the possibilities.
    Loáiciga HA
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(6):816-21. PubMed ID: 23445370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.